My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
3/18/2019 11:37:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2019 03 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
remaining 21 % will be assigned to the wastewater revenue to correspond to the expenses. The <br />average reclaim revenue of approximately $180,400 will be removed from the water fund. This <br />decrease would be equivalent to an offset of a 3.5% onetime increase in the potable water rate or <br />could smooth out over time. <br />Long Term Capital - Neither marginal option contains a recovery mechanism for long term capital. <br />With the recent WWTP upgrade project much of the reclaim system has been replaced. However, <br />future capital projects both budgeted and yet to be identified would either need to be fully <br />supported by the utility funds or accounted for in the long term capital programs for General Fund <br />- Parks and/or the Golf Course Fund. Current budgeted projects are accounted entirely in the utility <br />funds. <br />Opportunity Costs - The City has been approached on numerous occasions to expand the reclaim <br />system to private businesses. Due to the lack of adequate amounts of excess reclaim supplies, <br />these discussions have been limited. The expressed interest has been at the current rate of 75% of <br />the potable rate. In addition, the City is routinely approached for the leasing of effluent with higher <br />values offered from businesses that the City may not desire to be associated with. Finally, from <br />an economic development prospective, providing reuse to an area like Conoco/Phillips could assist <br />in incentivizing or attracting development. From a strict financial stand point, the Utility could <br />achieve greater revenues from these other sources than what is being proposed with a marginal <br />reclaim rate. Staff would request that the new reclaim rate be clearly defined as a "City -only <br />reclaim rate" to avoid complications or future negotiations of reclaim or effluent. In addition, the <br />existing policy of 75% of potable rate should be maintained for all non -City customers. <br />Conclusion: <br />The determination of a reclaim rate is challenging and can be calculated in a variety of ways. City <br />Council sets reclaim rates by resolution. Utility staff recommend that the rate remain at 75% of <br />the potable rate for all non -City customers. However, the proposed pre unit reclaim rate of $0.85 <br />per thousand gallons for City -only reclaim customers is defensible and there are no objections to <br />utilizing this rate moving forward. This rate structure would begin in 2019. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.