My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 03 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 03 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
3/25/2019 9:58:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2019 03 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 18, 2019 <br />Page 12 of 13 <br />18th - Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, 6:30 p.m. <br />April <br />11th — Museum Program, Louisville Photographs, Library, 7:00 p.m. <br />15th - Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, 6:30 p.m. <br />Selvoski noted that staff would bring an item in a future agenda about Commission <br />subcommittees and outreach. <br />UPDATES FROM COMMISSION <br />Thomas presented his insights from the Saving Places Conference. He attended <br />several days of sessions, including an interesting grassroots campaign at the Molly <br />Brown House and a technical session on repairing old windows. <br />Dickinson also attended the conference, where people asked him about the Blue Parrot <br />sign. He asked for an update on the Blue Parrot sign and if the Commission needed to <br />see an item about it on the agenda. Dickinson also asked staff to look into the tunnels <br />beneath Louisville. He thought getting access to the tunnels would be a cool thing to <br />pursue. Finally, he reminded the Commission about the resources that are available <br />from the state. He wondered if there was a way to get a blueprint for how to actively <br />save a building if it ever went on sale. He noted that the HPC had a mandate to do that <br />kind of planning. <br />Zuccaro replied that the City was allowed to use the Fund for acquisition, though it was <br />complicated as far as financial risk was concerned. There was a resolution that had <br />language about acquisition, but it was not very specific. <br />Thomas stated that the Commission should have a list of structures that the City wanted <br />to preserve. <br />Zuccaro replied that the historic contexts were meant to help that process. He added <br />that the state preservation funds represented a risk for the City since they were grants, <br />not guaranteed income. <br />Haley added that sometimes having an HPF sometimes made it harder to get money <br />from the state. <br />Klemme responded that the City could step in and landmark structures before selling <br />them. <br />Dickinson reiterated that he thought the City should have a list of target structures to <br />landmark and preserve. <br />Klemme stated that she attended the Saving Places Conference and learned some of <br />the basics of historic preservation and how to promote the Fund to the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.