My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 03 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
4/3/2019 9:20:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 03 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 19 2019 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />floor in active use with people coming and going all day but that could be any number of <br />uses. He understands the concern of the public but this project does meet the standards <br />which are stricter in downtown than the rest of town <br />Councilmember Maloney noted this is a complicated item Downtown is very eclectic and <br />this fits our character The design does respect the architecture downtown It works and <br />the mass and scale work better now He would like the first floor to be an active use so <br />maybe Council needs to address that another way The design meets the downtown <br />requirements. He supports the project. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing <br />Motion Mayor Pro Tem Lipton moved to approve Resolution No 9, Series 2019 as <br />presented Councilmember Loo seconded <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the applicant did an outstanding job to bring a design that <br />meets our requirements. It will be an asset to the community <br />Councilmember Loo stated she liked both designs. She noted some of the reason people <br />are concerned is they want things to stay the same. What we like here in Louisville, low <br />density, is very, very expensive to build and the market won't provide the funding to do <br />that. Then we will have complaints nothing is happening in Louisville. We don't know what <br />the answer is, we love the low density but we need to be realistic that economically it is <br />very difficult. She would like to keep Boulder Creek in the downtown <br />Councilmember Leh stated he likes the design and the changes are a good addition to <br />downtown He supports the plan and the criteria for the PUD and Special Review Use <br />have been met. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he understands changes on Main Street are hard and everyone will <br />have opinions on design He appreciates the concerns, but notes our framework plan <br />calls for variability of heights and sizes of buildings so we do not end up with a canyon - <br />like street. He thinks the design recognizes the historic character and tries to compliment <br />other designs on Main Street. He noted the HPC feels this is a compatible design and <br />supports this. <br />Vote Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote <br />RESOLUTION NO 10, SERIES 2019 -A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPERTY <br />TAX INCREMENT REBATE AGREEMENT WITH 712 MAIN LLC AND 722 MAIN LLC <br />PURSUANT TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE <br />LOUISVILLE REVITALIZATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE <br />Mayor Muckle reiterated Council will not take action on this tonight but will discuss it and <br />continue the item to another meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.