My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 04 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 04 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 11:29:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 04 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
floor in active use with people coming and going all day but that could be any number of <br />uses. He understands the concern of the public but this project does meet the standards <br />which are stricter in downtown than the rest of town. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted this is a complicated item. Downtown is very eclectic and <br />this fits our character. The design does respect the architecture downtown. It works and <br />the mass and scale work better now. He would like the first floor to be an active use so <br />maybe Council needs to address that another way. The design meets the downtown <br />requirements. He supports the project. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />Motion: Mayor Pro Tem Lipton moved to approve Resolution No. 9, Series 2019 as <br />presented. Councilmember Loo seconded. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the applicant did an outstanding job to bring a design that <br />meets our requirements. It will be an asset to the community. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she liked both designs. She noted some of the reason people <br />are concerned is they want things to stay the same. What we like here in Louisville, low <br />density, is very, very expensive to build and the market won't provide the funding to do <br />that. Then we will have complaints nothing is happening in Louisville. We don't know what <br />the answer is, we love the low density but we need to be realistic that economically it is <br />very difficult. She would like to keep Boulder Creek in the downtown. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he likes the design and the changes are a good addition to <br />downtown. He supports the plan and the criteria for the PUD and Special Review Use <br />have been met. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he understands changes on Main Street are hard and everyone will <br />have opinions on design. He appreciates the concerns, but notes our framework plan <br />calls for variability of heights and sizes of buildings so we do not end up with a canyon - <br />like street. He thinks the design recognizes the historic character and tries to compliment <br />other designs on Main Street. He noted the HPC feels this is a compatible design and <br />supports this. <br />Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10, SERIES 2019 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPERTY <br />TAX INCREMENT REBATE AGREEMENT WITH 712 MAIN LLC AND 722 MAIN LLC <br />PURSUANT TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE <br />LOUISVILLE REVITALIZATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE <br />Mayor Muckle reiterated Council will not take action on this tonight but will discuss it and <br />continue the item to another meeting. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.