My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 04 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 04 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
4/19/2019 12:29:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2019 04 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, March 15, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />the next meeting. The Committee continued discussing project costs and how <br />construction wages are driving the costs up. <br />Water Line Break — The Second project discussed was related to the water line <br />break at Eisenhower. The current estimate for this work will increase the cost of <br />the waterline replacement program by an additional $1.5 million. Mr. Kowar <br />explained that the cause of the break appears to be corrosion resulting from soil <br />conditions. To mitigate the corrosive soils, the City has utilizes PVC pipe in the <br />waterline replacement program for many years. Mr. Kowar continued discussing <br />where the lines will be replaced and what is included in the scope of work. <br />SCWTP Disinfection Evaluation - Mr. Peterson presented the two main factors that <br />are driving up the cost for this project. Mr. Kowar added the intent of the project is <br />to improve the safety and functionality of the water plant. Given the higher cost, <br />Mr. Kowar has directed staff to reevaluate the alternatives and confirm the <br />appropriate direction forward. The existing chlorine system has been noted as part <br />of the sanitary survey inspections performed by the Colorado Department of Public <br />Health and Environment as requiring future improvements to maintain compliance. <br />Mr. Peterson stated that it is highly likely that the City will either need to make the <br />switch as currently recommended or design improvements to the existing system <br />within the next two years. <br />SCWTP Upgrades — Mr. Peterson explained the needs and desires for the <br />renovation of the administration building. He went on to illustrate the two options <br />of renovating approximately 500 square feet of existing space or/and the <br />expansion of around 750 square feet of new space. Councilmember Stolzmann <br />stated that this project should be integrated with the disinfection project and should <br />be decided together. <br />Windy Gap — Mr. Peterson described the ongoing delay and the impacts to the <br />overall project budget. <br />Operating and Maintenance Budget - Mr. Peterson went on to explain that a couple <br />items got inappropriately accounted for in the operating line items during the <br />budget process. The largest two being the lead and copper sampling and the <br />ground penetrating radar for the Eisenhower waterline break. Mr. Peterson stated <br />that several of budget items approved for 2019 were below the 2018 expenditures. <br />These operational budget items are included in the proposed budget amendment <br />for an upcoming Council meeting. <br />NCWCD Pump Station — Mr. Peterson outlined that NCWCD (Northern Water) as <br />updated their last estimate of $93,000 in 2019 to $150,000 in 2020. This work is <br />tied to the City's prorate of the shared costs for these facilities. Committee <br />discussed time lines of design, bidding and construction. <br />Tap Fees — Mr. Peterson summarized the shortages on tap fees revenue for 2018. <br />In discussion, it was determined the shortage was related more to timing of projects <br />not developing as quickly as estimated. Mr. Peterson reminded the Committee <br />that that rate model utilizes a delayed mechanism for the tap fees and 2018 <br />revenue are shown in the 2019 model year. This delay mutes the model response <br />to tap fee revenue and provides for greater time for adjustments or response. Mr. <br />Peterson explained how the tap fees are tied to the population projection. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.