My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 04 05
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 04 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:39 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 12:34:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2019 04 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Annual Evaluation <br />Part 1 — City Council Evaluation <br />Evaluation forms will be anonymous and kept confidential through the process, however <br />the final rating is public record. <br />Outstanding <br />Distinctive <br />performance <br />Fully <br />Satisfactory <br />Marginal <br />Unsatisfactory <br />No Opinion <br />or No <br />Observation <br />Do Not <br />Know <br />Do you feel the City Council <br />is getting value for its legal <br />fees? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />provide honest <br />recommendations given all <br />legal issues and <br />ramifications? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />possess an efficient and <br />effective knowledge of the <br />Municipal Code and City <br />Charter? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />possess an efficient and <br />effective knowledge of <br />government regulations and <br />case law regarding issues <br />facing the City? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />proactively identify potential <br />issues to avoid future <br />problems? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Is the City Attorney's <br />approach effective in <br />achieving the best possible <br />legal outcomes for the City? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />represent the City in a <br />professional and ethical <br />manner? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Is the City Attorney impartial <br />and objective in her duties <br />and responsibilities? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />Does the City Attorney <br />communicate effectively <br />with the City Council and <br />staff? <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />N/O <br />DNK <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.