My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2019 05 02
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2019 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:21 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 2:24:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2019 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
110 Citynf <br />Om Louisville <br />COLORAI)O•SINCE I878 <br />unlawful for a contractor to fail to obtain inspection services when required, <br />or to fail to obtain a permit when it is required." (Emphasis added.) <br />6. Alleged fact: On or about August 28, 2018, Mr. Louden installed a new roof at 1160 <br />Hillside Lane Louisville, CO 80027 without pulling the required building permit. <br />a. Alleged violation: If true, the installation of the roof without a building permit <br />would violate LMC § 5.12.120 (Failure to obtain required permit or inspection), <br />which reads as follows: "It shall be unlawful for a contractor to fail to obtain <br />inspection services when required, or to fail to obtain a permit when it is <br />required." (Emphasis added.) <br />7. Alleged Fact: Mr. Louden at a second residence at 583 Manorwood Lane, Louisville <br />Colorado, failed to make the correction of adding Ice and Water Shield to the roof, which <br />was required by the City Inspector's Report, dated December 13, 2018. Further, Mr. <br />Louden allowed the house to stay exposed to the elements while he called in 3 more <br />inspections that failed for the same violation. On December 20, 2018, the City's <br />Inspector, Mr. Isaias Huizar, recorded the following in his inspection notes: "The fact that <br />he allowed the house to stay exposed, vulnerable to any harsh weather, clearly showed <br />me that Severy Creek Roofing had no intention in meeting minimum standards for any <br />roofing job he acquired. Thus, making me skeptical and more attentive to every <br />inspection I performed for Severy Creek Roofing." <br />a. Alleged Violation: If true, the failure to install the required roof correction, per the <br />City Inspector, would violate LMC § 5.12.150.A. (Violation; penalty), which reads <br />as follows: "It shall be unlawful for any contractor licensed or registered under <br />the provisions of this chapter to violate any provision of this chapter; or to refuse <br />to obey any order issued, or neglect to pay any fee assessed, under authority of <br />this chapter." (Emphasis added.) <br />b. Alleged Violation: If true, the temporary abandonment of the roof project, would <br />violate LMC § 5.12.130 (Abandoning contract or departing from specifications <br />prohibited), which reads as follows: "It shall be unlawful for any contractor <br />licensed or registered under this chapter to without good cause abandon any <br />contract or undertaking, or to make material departure from the city -approved <br />plans and specifications for any contract or undertaking." (Emphasis added.) <br />3IPage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.