Laserfiche WebLink
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Meeting Minutes <br />(DATE) <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />city attorney clarified that in the revised article. Berry suggests adopting Article Vlll <br />Bylaws with the parenthesis removed. Berry suggests that Article 9, Section 5 <br />testimony section B be removed. Novik wants to mention if items were missing since <br />this was new to the BCBOA. There was no comment. Root comments that the <br />standards for bringing the case to the board is also in the municipal code and Article <br />VIII Bylaw is the formality of procedures. If the Bylaw is adopted, this will give the <br />board direction on what action to bring forward to the contractor. <br />Knapp moved and Geise seconded a motion to adopt Article VIII and VIX By laws <br />with removal of parenthesis (section 12) and removal of article 9 sec 5B. Voice vote. <br />Motion passed 5-0. <br />Staff Comments: <br />Root informs the board that he reached out to North Metro Home Builders <br />Association regarding a State Legislature Plumbing Bill and the way the city performs <br />inspections. Root would need a Master or Journeyman Plumber on staff for <br />inspections, which would result in adding one inspector and getting rid of another. He <br />also discusses it could put plumbing inspections out 30 days in rural area as the state <br />has 30 days to perform a re -inspection. The city is against the bill. Berry clarifies that <br />the city would require a master plumber to perform plumbing work. Root explains <br />there are to be three journeymen to one master plumber. The trade-off is to ask <br />municipalities to card plumbers on permitted projects. The proposed bill does not <br />recognize ICC certifications, which three of Louisville's inspectors have. <br />Root also comments upon adopting Article VIII By-laws to revoking contractor's <br />license. He states that we may have three or four residents coming forward with <br />contractor's that violated working without being a Louisville licensed contractor or <br />contractor walking out on the job. Root will possibly be bringing forward a roofing <br />contractor that has been installing roofs without permits and performing faulty <br />installation at the next meeting. Geise commented on no more discussion on the <br />subject until an affidavit is presented. <br />Board Comments: <br />None <br />Discussion Items for Next Meeting: <br />Root states that the next meeting will be April 18, 2019. He also says that an affidavit <br />should be submitted from a resident to revoke a contractor's license. Schettler <br />recommends to the board to go or watch a hearing take place. Berry requests the <br />hearing script before the next meeting. <br />Adjourn: <br />Matt moved and Ed seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed <br />unanimously by voice vote. The meeting was adjoumed at 8:05 PM. <br />