My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 05 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 05 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:29 AM
Creation date
5/16/2019 2:03:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2019 05 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />April 8, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Business Matters of Commission <br />• Urban Renewal "101" Discussion <br />Director DeJong talked about Urban Renewal in Louisville. He reviewed Urban <br />Renewal Law and the purpose, formation, powers and Tax Increment Financing (TIF). <br />City Attorney Kelly noted there is a cooperation agreement with the City which allows <br />for City Council to retain control over a lot of the activities of the LRC. Power for <br />eminent domain calls for a super majority. State allows for sales tax increment <br />financing but is not in play for the Hwy 42 area. Kelly noted the differences in the Hwy <br />42 and the 550 S. McCaslin areas and that there are more blight factors in Hwy 42. <br />Blight factors are determined by City Council as it is a legislative determination. There <br />isn't a defined checklist for how it is determined. <br />A question was raised about whether blight is one building or area. DeJong noted it is <br />determined by area. <br />A question was asked if there is a process for removing blight from an area. City <br />Attorney Kelly there is nothing that speaks to removing the blight but it is an important <br />concept since a property within could have zero blight factors. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton wanted a history and how blight was determined. He wanted it <br />noted how properties doing well are included with the blighted properties. Attorney <br />Kelly asked how far back. Lipton wanted as far back as we could so anyone added to <br />the board could understand. <br />Commissioner Adler asked could the boundaries be expanded. Attorney Kelly <br />responded yes with an amendment which triggers coming into compliance with recent <br />state legislation changes. Lipton asked if the removal of properties cause the same. <br />Amendments would trigger changes membership of LRC and representation of <br />districts. Tofte asked if adding to the area required a survey. The answer was yes, <br />the survey would have to be revisited. <br />A question was asked if there are new urban renewal area added examples. DeJong <br />said there are some in the state. <br />Highway 42 Urban Renewal Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.