My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2019 05 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2019 05 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
5/16/2019 2:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, narrowness or <br />shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the <br />affected property; <br />»»» This lot and house are located next to a 55+mph hwy with a distance of 80' from the lot <br />line to the road which directs road noise up the driveway. Many cities build much larger sound <br />walls on a regular basis. Hwy/287 is a very close example. <br />2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the neighborhood or <br />district in which the property is located; <br />»»» There are no neighbors that would be affected by this fence. Pearl Izumi has mountain <br />views to the west and over the top of the proposed site. <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot reasonably <br />be developed in conformity with the provisions of this title; <br />»»» Not Applicable <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant; <br />»»» Hardship is that a normal house setting in a neighborhood with a 20' setback fence <br />distance requirement for taller fence (4'+) would make sense. In this setting the proportions of <br />80' back from car traffic @ 55+mph would make sense to allow an exception to this general rule. <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or <br />district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate <br />use or development of adjacent property; <br />»» It is my belief that with the provided photo renderings of what is proposed, will in no way <br />deter or create a negative characteristic of the property, site line of mountain range, etc.. Much <br />thought and effort have been placed on the design to appeal to both public aesthetics and <br />homeowner enjoyment. <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is the least <br />modification possible of the provisions on this title which are in question. <br />»»> Due to the shape of the rolling hillsides, the proposed fence size, length & height seem to <br />be appropriate and tasteful for the location in consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.