My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 06 11
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 06 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
6/11/2019 2:37:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A1
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 28, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />Underpass Projects <br />Mayor Muckle stated he is supportive of funding the underpass a Steel Ranch/Bullhead <br />Gulch with the cost increase; we have promised this underpass for a long time now. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like to keep all of the underpasses on the list even <br />knowing we can't afford them all without new revenue. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the Dillon/88th underpass seems like it's unnecessary <br />as there are other safe ways to cross the street nearby. Libhart stated it was included to <br />help traffic flow and maintaining flow in the future and hold off upgrading capacity on <br />Dillon. Members decided to leave this as a long-term goal. <br />Members discussed their various opinions for prioritizing of the underpasses. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the at grade solutions are much cheaper and seem to work <br />in most communities. He stated traffic flow is a key criteria for underpasses and we need <br />strict criteria for when we build an underpass. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he would like to use at grade solutions rather than <br />underpasses for South Boulder Road and Via Appia, South Boulder Road and Main <br />Street, South Boulder Road and 95th Street, and the Powerline Trail at Dillon. He stated <br />that we should start with the at grade improvements before exploring underpass options. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like to keep the underpasses in the plan and consider <br />asking the public for dedicated funding. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the at grade improvements would happen first and an underpass <br />could be considered in the future. Councilmember Maloney stated these community <br />requests are likely far too much to fund. We need to set priorities for what we can do. He <br />would keep them on the list, but far down on the priority. <br />Mayor Muckle stated it is important to list the crossings we want to address whether it is <br />at grade or not; he would like to do what we can to keep the long-term projects on the list. <br />The consensus was to add underpasses to the list at South Boulder Road and <br />Eisenhower, Lake Park and Via Appia, Dillon Road and Powerline Trail, and the <br />Powerline Trail and Via Appia. Keep them on the list for if/when we can afford them. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like a statement included with the list that the City will <br />pursue at grade upgrades first before going directly to underpasses and include the <br />general criteria of what is evaluated before an underpass is considered. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.