Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 21 2019 <br />Page 3 of 14 <br />LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS OUTLOT A, DAVIDSON HIGHLINE SUBDIVISION <br />REPLAT 2 — 2nd READING, PUBLIC HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 4/12/19) <br />Mayor Muckle moved to continue this item to June 4, Councilmember Maloney seconded <br />Voice Vote all in favor <br />RESOLUTION NO 17, SERIES 2019 — A RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTIONS <br />IMPLEMENTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND BY REENACTING INTO A <br />SINGLE RESOLUTION INCORPORATING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS, <br />PROVIDING UPDATES FOR THE RECENT BALLOT MEASURE, AND INCREASING <br />CERTAIN INCENTIVES <br />Mayor Muckle introduced the item by title <br />Planner Solvoski stated some changes were made to the language in the resolution and <br />copies were available on the dais. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) has been <br />reviewing the historic preservation program specifically to look at what the maximum <br />amounts should be for historic structure assessments, residential grants, and commercial <br />grants, are there ways to simplify the grant process, how to eliminate barriers to land - <br />marking, how to make the program more user-friendly; should there be an update to the <br />new construction grant criteria to match the alteration certificate language, how should <br />changes apply to previously landmarked properties, and is this an incentive to landmark <br />or a way to facilitate maintenance <br />Staff surveyed local architects and contractors who have worked in the program to better <br />understand the cost of preservation projects The feedback staff got was the grants need <br />to be increased to be useful Staff and the HPC are recommending increasing the grant <br />levels for both commercial and residential grants. Solvoski reviewed the specific grant <br />levels being proposed for each type of grant and other changes to the program including <br />higher funding amounts available, allowing a grant for new construction for residential <br />properties, new criteria for the grants, and new timelines for grants <br />Solvoski stated the current balance of the fund is estimated at almost $2M Average <br />revenue over the last three years is $731,000 annually For future revenues 80% goes <br />into the Historic Preservation Fund and 20% into museum operations. Administrative <br />costs average $140,000 annually Over the next 10 years of the grant, staff estimates <br />additional available funds of approximately $5 9M <br />With the updated incentives, staffs target is four new residential landmarks and one <br />commercial landmark annually for the next 10 years. If all properties maximize their <br />grants, this would result in expenditures of $5,650,000 from the Historic Preservation <br />Fund In addition, funds need to be maintained for the revolving loan program Staff finds <br />the estimated revenue over the next 10 years is adequate to fund grants at the proposed <br />levels and maintain an additional $1-2 million for the revolving loan fund <br />