My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 05 28 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 05 28 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
6/12/2019 9:06:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 28, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />Our responsibility is to decide if these projects meet our policies not to discuss the details <br />of each project. <br />Councilmember Loo stated the price tag on this is phenomenal and the list is aspirational <br />She will have to tell her constituents that two-thirds of these projects are just too much <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we are not at the budget conversations yet; we need to <br />identify what is critical and important; some projects have cost-effective alternatives. <br />Mayor Muckle stated we don't know what funding will be, there are options We should <br />have a list that is both specific and aspirational There is value in the rankings even if we <br />don't have funding identified currently <br />Corridor Projects <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked that the cost of right turn lanes be included in the <br />Corridor 4, Via Appia information rather than the Downtown connector project. <br />Corridor 6, South Boulder Road — Director Zuccaro stated this is a new study that came <br />out of the NAMS process. This would be a study in the next 10 years or so to look at <br />getting people from Lafayette to Boulder It would be a regional project with surrounding <br />communities to study South Boulder Road as a whole Councilmember Stolzmann and <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton do not support such a project; we have other priorities. Mayor <br />Muckle stated a lot of base work has been done in the NAMS study and deciding we don't <br />have any interest would be throwing out a lot of work and access to possible funding <br />Members would like to make sure the transportation projects in the McCaslin Small Area <br />Plan are included in this plan <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like the Kaylix connection to South Boulder Road <br />shown on the map Councilmember Loo agreed <br />Councilmember Loo stated she wants to reiterate that Via Appia should not be reduced to <br />one lane <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like a secondary road network in the McCaslin area <br />included Director Zuccaro noted street connections through private property are not <br />shown here so as not to alarm owners, but they can be helpful for redevelopment. <br />Members agreed to show that. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like noise mitigation for US 36, Dillon Road, and the <br />Hwy 42 and 96th Street corridors included in the list as she gets requests for these <br />frequently Councilmember Stolzmann would like a full movement intersection on <br />McCaslin north of Lamar's. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.