Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 4 2019 <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />APPROPRIATIONS AND ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN SUCH FUNDS <br />AND ADJUSTING BUDGETED REVENUE IN THE GENERAL FUND, OPEN SPACE & <br />PARKS FUND, HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND, RECREATION FUND, CAPITAL <br />PROJECTS FUND, AND RECREATION CENTER CONSTRUCTION FUND — PUBLIC <br />HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 5/31/19) <br />Mayor Muckle introduced the resolution by title and opened the public hearing <br />Director Watson stated this amends the budget for 5 general reasons. 1) carry forward <br />unused appropriations from 2018, 2) adjust appropriations for items not anticipated, 3) <br />reallocate replacement contributions to the Technology Management Fund, 4) adjust <br />appropriations for wages and benefits, and 5) to adjust the revenue budget for delayed <br />project revenue <br />He reviewed the fiscal impact of the amendment noting all funds are projected to retain <br />adequate levels of reserves through 2019 When the 2019 budget was adopted in <br />November 2018, we were projecting an ending General Fund balance of $5 3 million <br />Including a 3 5% turnback, we are now estimating an ending General Fund balance of <br />$8 0 million He added that an error was made on the golf course fund line, there is now a <br />positive adjustment and it now shows there is a reasonable balance in the fund <br />Director Watson stated the Finance Committee has reviewed this information <br />Councilmember Loo asked why the downtown paver project had a large carryover <br />Director Kowar stated staff has not been able to get bids for the project; either contractors <br />were not qualified or did not have enough employees <br />Public Comments — None <br />Councilmember Keany noted there are a number of items for which the line item was <br />reduced in the original budget process but later it was amended to increase it again That <br />process seems concerning City Manager Balser stated staff makes its best guess on <br />costs but we now believe we need the additional funds as compared to a year ago <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted the transfer to the Rec Center construction fund of <br />$247K is coming from impact fees. She would have preferred we used that to cover the <br />cost over runs last year She would like a policy that impact fee money is the first that is <br />used when it is appropriate Try to adhere to spending impact fee funds first given they <br />are restricted and must be used in a specific time frame <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton is concerned about the continued assumption of sales tax at 2%, <br />Council should consider lowering that given current revenue information <br />