My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 06 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 06 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
6/12/2019 9:07:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 4, 2019 <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />Public Comments <br />David Sinkey, Boulder Creek Homes 712 Main Street, noted his company has a pending <br />application for TIF, but this is more general He stated the LRC has some great tools to <br />incentivize and create change in the City and it should be as clear as possible for anyone <br />considering applying He would like the language to be simplified and easier to bring <br />something forward and have a debate The language under the "Potential TIF <br />Consideration" is confounding He stated both the Council and the LRC have the option to <br />make changes to any deal <br />Councilmember Maloney asked why include under "Potential TIF consideration" <br />encourage transferring a building to a tenant. Director DeJong stated this is intended to <br />help when a tenant wants to own a building Owners tend to stay in the community so we <br />want to encourage that. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated for governments to give financial assistance to <br />corporations we should have economic indicators and other information to understand the <br />health of the community and then determine what the healthy target growth rates are that <br />we want to see and if we need to stimulate anything beyond that. We need to understand <br />the impact we are having on the community and if that is fair to other business owners. <br />Those economic indicators would be invaluable to let us know if the stimulus is warranted <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated financial stimulus is not the only way to eliminate blight. <br />She believes if economic indicators such as sales and property tax and our financial <br />reports show it is not reasonable we should not provide corporate subsidies given the <br />market. She is concerned with the document holistically; should we be providing these <br />subsidies, how will it affect rent rates, property values, and historic preservation We need <br />to identify when we would use this funding We need to further define the problem we are <br />trying to resolve and need to consider the long term impact. We need to think about the <br />long term impacts of these changes. She stated this is not a prudent direction to go <br />Councilmember Loo asked about the criteria and if a project has to meet all of them <br />Director DeJong stated that is up to Council Councilmember Loo suggested a project <br />wouldn't have to meet all criteria She would add a line criteria about rehabilitating <br />potentially historic structures or buildings located within the downtown <br />Councilmember Loo stated the section noting it can't affect all other City plans also sends <br />a message that we are interested in historic preservation while still allowing flexibility <br />Mayor Muckle agreed <br />Councilmember Leh asked if the objectives section should define or replace "several" to <br />be clear; perhaps state "at least two and preferably more " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.