My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2019 06 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDSCAPING ADVISORY BOARD (fka HORTICULTURE FORESTRY ADVISORY BOARD)
>
2000-2019 Horticulture and Forestry Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2019 06 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:40:38 AM
Creation date
6/21/2019 11:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PPLABPKT 2019 06 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. Landscape Renovations With Water— design will include a plant palette approved by <br />PPLAB which will focus on minimal shrubs, trees if appropriate, and aggregate mulch. <br />2. Landscape Renovations Without Water — design will focus on a selection of aggregate <br />mulch and boulders if appropriate. <br />Examples are attached <br />Related Policy and Emergent Issues <br />This CIP raised a number of issues while PPLAB was working on formulating a program. <br />Although PPLAB did discuss these issues at some level, PPLAB is moving forward with a <br />recommended program and in doing so, making City Council aware of uncovered issues if <br />Council so chooses to investigate further. However, having said that, the chosen program <br />approach should minimize related issues. <br />Policy Issues: <br />• Equity — In some cases, the intent may have been the responsibility of an association to <br />maintain. Active HOAs may also claim that they should also be eligible for <br />improvements. There are other public use areas beyond subdivision entries that are not <br />a part of this CIP, but are similar in need and with similar issues. For example, this CIP <br />does not address needed landscape improvements in right-of-way cul-de-sac <br />landscaped beds. <br />• Implications for Commercial Zones — It is possible that commercial properties would <br />request being eligible for this improvement program. While it is less common for <br />commercial properties to allow their property maintenance/improvement funding to <br />become defunct, there are some properties that might pursue access to these entry <br />improvement funds. <br />• Clear Representation from Defunct HOAs — Staff has already experienced that there are <br />differing opinions and unclear representation from defunct HOAs. It could be <br />challenging to achieve representative input and agreement for entry design. Because of <br />which, staff will work with PPLAB to serve as the decision -making entity when <br />representation is unclear. <br />Emergent Issue — Municipal Code Gap Related to ROW Maintenance Responsibilities: <br />• As this issue and other landscape maintenance issues have come up over recent years, <br />staff has identified a gap in the city's right-of-way (ROW) maintenance ordinances. It is <br />typical for local governments to have a more clear delineation of maintenance <br />responsibility related to the ROW from back of curb to private property. A clear <br />example that does exist in the City of Louisville's ordinances is sidewalk snow removal <br />responsibility, which is the responsibility of adjacent property owners within 24 hours of <br />a snow event. However, maintenance for vegetation is not clear in the City of Louisville <br />2 <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.