My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 06 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 06 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:29 AM
Creation date
6/21/2019 11:35:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2019 06 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />May 13, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Business Matters of Commission <br />• Fire District revenue sharing request <br />Louisville Fire Protection District (LFPD) Chief Willson and Board President <br />Chris Schmidt, were introduced by Economic Development Director Aaron <br />DeJong. DeJong said that LFPD met with staff in early April to discuss a <br />shareback agreement. LFPD thinking of asking for a mill levy increase this fall <br />by Louisville voters. Assuming a 50% shareback of the Fire District's mill levy, <br />approximately $63,000 would be returned in the 2018 budget. <br />As increment grows in future years the amount of the share back would also <br />grow. <br />Chief Willson thanked the LRC for allowing them to come and make a request <br />for revenue sharing. Today he is here to start the discussion: is there a <br />possibility of sharing mill levy in future? LFPD relies on property tax for funding. <br />Service calls have increased 80% as the Louisville population ages. <br />Redevelopment projects may potentially increase demands on LFPD <br />LFPD supports redevelopment efforts, though it will make them busier. LFPD <br />looking at all revenue sources. They would like to add a second engine to <br />increase response time. <br />A question was asked if any developments cause more issues — yes, the <br />Kestrel has increased demand on services, but it is not in the URA. Has <br />increased calls by 150 per year. LFPD is working with management to make <br />area safer for elderly people. Balfour's population also increases call volume. <br />A question was asked if there will there be a relationship between rebate and <br />what is served by URA? Potential is there. LFPD has to reasonably have crew <br />to handle any type of emergency. <br />A question was asked; as population increases and as buildout happens, <br />shouldn't revenues increase? Yes, but the Gallagher amendment may limit that <br />growth. If Residential Assessment Rate drops down there will be less revenue <br />for LFPD. If they receive TIF shareback, they will still go to voters for mill levy <br />increase, but the ask could be less. Employee pay is low and LFPD is seeing <br />higher employee turnover. They need to increase pay and add people and <br />remodel Station 2. LFPD currently has no debt. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.