My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Local Licensing Authority Agenda and Packet 2019 06 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY
>
2000-2019 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Minutes
>
2019 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Packets
>
Local Licensing Authority Agenda and Packet 2019 06 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:44:13 PM
Creation date
6/21/2019 12:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Local Licensing Authority <br />Minutes <br />May 20, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Jason Pardikes, 8989 E. 148th Ave., Brighton, CO owner of Renew Movement <br />which will be right next to this store, took the oath and introduced himself to the <br />Authority. He noted he had met the owners. He was concerned about odor <br />mitigation. He noted his shop is now treating young people. An informal survey <br />was conducted and about 70% of the respondents had negative feedback about <br />having the marijuana store next door. He noted his business treats health issues <br />like carpal tunnel and other chronic pain with physical stretching; a cross <br />between physical therapy and massage. <br />Authority member Kaufman asked if odor was the concern or just that it is a <br />marijuana business. <br />Pardikes noted odor was an issue and part of it was the health conscious <br />clientele they serve as well as the fact they are now serving families and children. <br />Lipton asked if there was anything in the guidelines to consider this objection. <br />Machado noted it was different than liquor licenses. He then asked if the <br />applicant had a closing statement. <br />Mr. Lindgren noted they do have an odor mitigation plan and having run a <br />cultivation facility are good at odor mitigation. Mr. Taggart noted smell mitigation <br />in a retail store is minimal compared to cultivation. <br />Mr. Lindgren stated no product is visible from the front of the business. <br />Lipton asked if the neighbors had been contacted. Mr. Lindgren noted he had <br />spoken to them all including Mr. Pardikes who had toured their store in Boulder. <br />Machado closed the public hearing and called for member discussion and <br />comments. <br />Carlson noted that planning and zoning found this location to be in compliance. <br />Attorney Culley noted planning and zoning would have determined if this was in <br />an area zoned correctly and the proper distance from schools. There is nothing <br />in code that prohibits a retail marijuana store being any distance from a business <br />such as Mr. Pardikes described. <br />Lipton noted there had been some objections heard by Council when they <br />allowed additional stores. <br />Machado noted the needs of the neighborhood are not a part of the approval <br />process here as it is for liquor licenses. The Authority is allowed to consider the <br />moral character of the applicant, whether the application is complete, any false or <br />misleading information and then a general sentence about the ability to deny a <br />license for good cause. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.