Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 11, 2019 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />The 2nd proposed ordinance submits to the registered electors of the City the question of <br />whether to permit such retail marijuana cultivation facilities within industrial zones of the <br />City, subject to the excise tax. Staff suggests Council listing specific regulations within the <br />ordinance so it does not need to be done following the election because of the short <br />timeframe We don't want an issue of cultivation beginning without regulations in place <br />City Manager Balser stated the Finance Committee supports the language <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the Finance Committee only looked at the ballot <br />language They did not discuss the regulations staff is suggesting be included The <br />Finance Committee did support Alternative 2 as imposing the five to ten percent seemed <br />reasonable and middle of the road compared to what other cities have done They <br />support using the funds for enforcement and for the general purposes of the City; the <br />intent to cover costs for these uses but also have flexibility for other uses <br />City Attorney Kelly stated the public finance counsel has reviewed the language and <br />confirmed it complies with TABOR. <br />Mayor Muckle stated to be clear the ballot questions would ask the voters if they want to <br />allow cultivation in the city and whether to impose an excise tax on it. <br />Public Comments <br />Patricia Ross, 3361 W Monmouth Ave , Englewood, pooled time with Joyce Ross, 924 <br />McKinley, stated her family has lived in town for many years She does not want this on <br />the ballot. Council should consider odor issues, during harvest time the smell is there and <br />can make people sick. Council should consider if the tax will cover the costs of <br />regulations and staff, additional cost for law enforcement, and environmental impacts <br />including the use of water Can the City enforce seed to sale regulations? The market is <br />saturated and it goes to the black market. Will this affect the rents? She stated this is not <br />my home town values, do not move forward on the ballot issues <br />Michael Deborski, 601 Pine Street, stated he has no issues with people using marijuana <br />responsibly or using it for its medicinal value He does not however like to see the large <br />ads for marijuana retailers in the newspaper and it becoming the norm in Louisville It <br />does not represent our family values We need to retain that and nurture it; that is our <br />brand We should not put that and our resources at risk for this small return He urged <br />Council to not put on the ballot. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated Council is trying to listen and this is why this is going to <br />ballot rather than approving it in February We will do what the voters want us to do She <br />is supportive of language recommended by Finance Committee <br />