Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 11 2019 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated there needs to be a unique situation and this is a two <br />story office building and not a unique situation She doesn't want to set this precedent for <br />office buildings when we already get complaints rents are too high She wants to send a <br />clear signal on what type of properties we are trying to incentivize <br />Councilmember Loo asked Mr Sinkey why they were having trouble getting retail on Main <br />Street. Sinkey stated for these buildings, one is too deep to function as retail and the <br />other is a viable retail building but needs major remodeling which may not make financial <br />sense In general on Main Street, he feels his business provides a vital daytime <br />population as would any office The uniqueness of this proposal is to change what is <br />functionally not working currently More office would contribute to the retail community of <br />Main Street. This project is unique because if fundamentally begins to change the density <br />of office dwellers downtown Building physical spaces designed for retail is the first step <br />and having office workers to contribute would be an enormous benefit. <br />Mayor Muckle stated one of the most important things in Louisville has been what policies <br />would be good for downtown and good for old town neighborhoods As a result he <br />supported the URA as we needed a walkable critical mass of people While not an easy <br />decision in the end, this is why he supports the building Business owners often report a <br />lack of day time population The building meets the goal of improving retail opportunity on <br />the ground floor and providing office space He feels some of the requests made by <br />Council for the new building may have created the financial gap that the developers now <br />face <br />Councilmember Stolzmann said Council did not request anything The application was <br />withdrawn and resubmitted with a new design <br />Mayor Muckle said for this request we should help facilitate it in terms of offering to give <br />back funds that wouldn't be generated otherwise The reasons he supports the building <br />are what make it reasonable to support the request. He agreed with the concern about <br />ending up with an office building, but this new building will be current modern retail space <br />and have a better chance of generating sales tax in that location that we don't have now <br />Councilmember Loo stated she remembers very vocal Council and public objection to the <br />original application The applicant listened to the meeting and came back with this design <br />Councilmember Loo stated this application boils down to a bird in hand versus possibly <br />nothing It guarantees a building that is worth much more than the current one and after <br />10 years all of the tax money will come back to all of the entities and it will be several <br />million dollars more than what is there now It is true we don't know what else might <br />happen, but we know it will be better than what is there She is interested in looking at the <br />50-90% range <br />Councilmember Keany stated he feels similar to Councilmember Loo He is not sure 90% <br />is appropriate He hears from many businesses downtown that the daytime population is <br />