Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />April 10, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Mike asked if we're doing any baseline vegetation surveys in order to assess the benefit <br />of the burn; Ember noted that these were done in early spring in anticipation of a spring <br />burn, but due to Rocky Mountain Fire's schedule, the burn will be done in the fall. Laura <br />suggested showing the video taken at Aquarius last year; a controlled burn has small <br />flames and looks very different from a wildfire. This might ally community fears. <br />12. Discussion Item: Review and Revise OSAB Letter Regarding Key Performance <br />Indicator Surveys <br />See summary of this topic and draft of letter to City Manager, starting on page 26 of the <br />April OSAB Meeting packet. The 4 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that the City <br />Manager and Finance Committee has requested that OSAB members perform (2019, <br />2020) are: <br />A. Acquisition Sub -Program: "OSAB Ranked and Council Reviewed Candidate <br />Parcel" <br />B. New Trails & Trail Maintenance Sub -Program: "Maintenance Rating" <br />C. New Trails & Trail Maintenance Sub -Program: "Trash Containers Rating" <br />D. Maintenance & Management Sub Program: "Maintenance of Open Space Rating <br />Ember reported that City Manager office is supportive of simple sample questions rather <br />than a thorough sampling plan. OSAB reviewed the draft letter to the City Manager <br />prepared by Mike and Missy, which refers to KPIs 2, 3, and 4. Laura proposed changing <br />the first sentence of the third paragraph of the proposed letter from: "Given these <br />constraints, the Board is willing to provide very general overall subjective grades mid- <br />year in each area." to "Given these constraints, the best the board could do would be to <br />provide very general overall subjective grades mid -year in each area." There was <br />general agreement from OSAB to send the letter with the edits discussed. Mike & Missy <br />to finalize the letter and send to City Manager. <br />13. Discussion Item: Comments on Candidate Parcels Table and Process <br />Helen proposed retaining the criteria developed 3 years ago, as it was extensively <br />discussed at the time of development and has been reviewed with Council. OSAB <br />agreed. Laura outlined the field trip plan; 2-3 hours at May and June meetings (second <br />Wednesday, approx. 6-8pm). Members of the public may attend, but will have to provide <br />their own transport. Laura asked if properties not selected for acquisition 3 years ago <br />should be re-evaluated. The consensus of the board was to not re-evaluate these <br />properties, although any board member may tour and assess these properties in <br />advance of the field trips. Ember noted that some parcels have been added since the <br />last time OSAB worked on this list; mostly by Council members, most of which are small <br />sliver parcels of land which is currently "Public Land" but not otherwise designated. <br />Responsibility for these public lands devolves to Parks, who often mows and does trash <br />pickup. OSAB agreed to look at the new parcels. <br />14. Discussions Items for the Next Meeting on Wednesday, May 8, 2019 <br />A. Acquisition field trip #1: Meet at Library parking lot at 6:00pm. <br />15. Adjourn <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:22 pm. <br />8 <br />