Laserfiche WebLink
Local Licensing Authority <br />Minutes <br />June 24, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Brown moved the Authority approve both transfer applications. Carlson <br />seconded. All in favor. <br />C. Transfer Application — Asian Dragon Inc. d/b/a Asian Dragon — Beer <br />and Wine License — 1387 E. South Boulder Road <br />Chairperson Machado called the item. Frank Su noted he was here with his <br />father's friend Xing Chu Du current owner of the restaurant. Carlson asked if <br />they were going to change the name of the restaurant. The applicant responded <br />he was not going to change the name and wanted to change it on the application <br />to keep the name Mr. Sake Sushi and Grill. <br />Machado called for member discussion and hearing none called for a motion. <br />Carlson moved the Authority approve the transfer application for Asian Dragon <br />Inc. d/b/a Mr. Sake Sushi and Grill. Lipton seconded. All in favor. Transfer <br />approved. <br />D. Change in Ownership Structure — Compassionate Pain <br />Management LLC d/b/a Ajoya — Combined Retail/Medical <br />Marijuana — 1100 W. Dillon Road <br />Machado introduced the item and noted it is going from 100% owned by <br />Shaun Gindi to his having 50% and three other individuals splitting the <br />remaining 50%. He noted he had confirmed with Secretary Hanson that the <br />three individuals being added were all over 21 years of age. <br />Brown asked Attorney Culley for the basis on which the Authority could not <br />allow this. She noted it would be if any of the owners have a criminal record <br />that disallows them owning a marijuana business. There are some <br />enumerated offenses such as felony drug offenses that prevent someone <br />from holding a marijuana license. If their criminal background shows they <br />are not of good moral character, could be basis for denial. We are been <br />relying on the State for the background checks. Secretary Hanson noted on <br />this particular application she had not heard if it had been approved by the <br />State nor if they ran into anything in the background checks. <br />Machado asked if our standards are the same as the state. Culley noted yes <br />it would likely be the same but there could be slightly different interpretations <br />of good moral character. The enumerated offenses would be the same. <br />Machado wondered if this should be continued. He asked if there was a spot <br />where they had to report any offenses in the application. Members found the <br />question in the application. <br />