My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 07 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 07 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 5:54:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />impact the original structure. The additions off the back, while technically historic, <br />maintain less integrity than the front portion of the structure. <br />Staff finds that the structure exemplifies architectural and social significance and <br />maintains physical integrity. Staff recommends approving a grant in the amount equal to <br />what City Council approves tomorrow night for Historic Preservation Assessment grants <br />since the Historic Preservation Fund is currently undergoing changes. <br />Request for conflicts of interest. None disclosed. <br />Dunlap asked about the fact that the property was for sale. <br />Selvoski replied that the applicant has the structure under contract and the owner has <br />signed off on the application, as well. <br />Dunlap asked if the south side of the structure would be preserved. <br />Applicant Michael Kalicak, Principal at Novy Partners, 24055 High Meadow Drive in <br />Golden, stated that both street -facing facades would be preserved in order to be <br />landmarked. He was still figuring out if the cinderblock additions would stay or go. <br />Ulm stated that this was his number one project to try to get landmarked and he was <br />happy with the application. <br />Parris noted that it was a visible landmark that had not been in great shape so she was <br />excited the applicant was bringing it forward. <br />Dickinson stated that he had been through the property a few times. It was one of the <br />properties that was going to take a lot of personal investment and he hoped that this <br />would be an opportunity for a partnership between the owners and the City to preserve <br />cool old buildings like this one and make them usable. <br />Kalicak explained that the intent was to preserve the front structure and potentially add <br />on living space in the rear to convert it to a single-family living space. <br />Ulm moved to find probable cause for 701 Grant and to use the grant amount for the <br />Historic Structure Assessment approved by City Council. Dickinson seconded. Roll call. <br />All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. <br />ITEMS FROM STAFF <br />Alteration Certificate/Demolition Review Updates <br />Staff and a subcommittee of the Commission granted an alteration certificate for 1116 <br />LaFarge based on the findings that the roofing materials are a reasonably good match <br />to the current materials and will not alter the general appearance of the project and that <br />replacing the roof will help to preserve the landmark. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.