My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 07 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 07 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:18 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 6:00:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />06/07/19 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Chairperson Maloney asked how incentives are handled in other municipalities, <br />and what challenges are being faced with the current process. Director DeJong <br />stated that the City of Boulder annually appropriates $250K in incentives to the <br />CMO to administer. Director DeJong stated that it can be difficult to convey to a <br />company that the BAP program is an incentive to come to Louisville, and not a <br />reward for a company already in the stages of moving to Louisville. Director <br />DeJong stated that once land has been purchased, or a lease signed, companies <br />are not eligible for BAP consideration. <br />Finance Committee Members and staff discussed the amount of incentives given <br />for small versus large projects, and what amount would be appropriate for the CMO <br />to administer. Director DeJong stated that $40K is the average break-point <br />between small and large projects. <br />Finance Committee Member Lipton stated that certain language in Section <br />3.24.040 Basis for Participation, and 3.24.050, Approval of Agreement; Conditions; <br />Effect, of the redline needs to be changed to incorporate better language, to add <br />a reporting requirement, and to clearly define conditions. Member Lipton stated <br />he would like the incentive amounts provided to the CMO to start at a modest cap <br />of $100K per year to see how it works. <br />Mayor Muckle and Chairperson Maloney stated they were in favor of Code <br />changes that would provide more flexibility, quicker response, and the ability for <br />the CMO to approve smaller BAP agreements. Chairperson Maloney stated he <br />would like language incorporated that provides City Council the maximum amount <br />of flexibility under extraordinary conditions. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he did not believe $100K annually was sufficient for the CMO, <br />and that he was not in favor of setting dollar limits within the Code. Director <br />DeJong stated that dollar values or limits could be included in a separate policy. <br />Finance Committee Members agreed to an annual $150K cap for CMO approved <br />BAP agreements. <br />Member Lipton raised the question of whether the BAP program is still relevant or <br />necessary. Mayor Muckle stated that the relevance and need of the program <br />varies with the economy. Member Lipton suggested a statement be added to the <br />Code or additional Policy that states that "as the City continues to work on its <br />strategic plan and other long-term goals, that this program and other tools will be <br />evaluated and continued at the discretion of City Council." <br />Chairperson Maloney requested the City Manager's Office revise the redline and <br />bring a draft of the Code changes for the Business Assistance Program back to <br />the Finance Committee on a Fall agenda. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.