Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 23, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />asked if the regulations are adequate to protect the community She noted the folks in <br />town who are not directly affected would likely vote for this Why compromise the quality <br />of life Please add buffers of 1000 feet to keep this drug away from residences She <br />asked Council to keep Louisville special <br />Mike Deborski, 601 Pine Street, noted the demand is there to sell pot. Folks are trying to <br />acquire licenses and the marijuana business defies typical business laws in place He <br />asked Council to address the setbacks and require a special review use (SRU) He cited <br />examples of small town Louisville and asked Council to keep it that way <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street cited two possible locations for cultivation facilities and <br />urged Council to require setbacks of 1000 to 1500 feet. <br />Sally Blaser, 2315 Cliffrose Lane said she walks Coal Creek Trail and sees students from <br />Centaurus on the trail nearly every day Grow facilities cause odor and she did not want <br />to see a grow facility close to Coal Creek trail or Miner's Field Water use is high in a grow <br />facility as is power Water is not plentiful in Colorado It shouldn't be near general public <br />areas Quality of life and good atmosphere are important to Louisville residents <br />Eric Maes, 1145 Pine Street, expressed concern about odor and noted he was in law <br />enforcement and has seen criminal activity around marijuana businesses and doesn't <br />want to see more He encouraged Council members to visit a cultivation facility before <br />putting this on the ballot. <br />Council comments <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted he was in favor of some type of setback. He asked about <br />the SRU process implications Director Zuccaro noted it could be added with criteria and <br />it is about a 5 month process to apply, prove criteria are met, and hold hearings New <br />building would likely have to get a PUD and an SRU in addition to a license and building <br />permit. As written now, they would have to get a license and building permit. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if regulations now have any water and power <br />considerations Director Zuccaro noted they would have to comply with the building code <br />but no water conservation effort is required There would be tap fee regulations and <br />some consideration there concerning the amount of use <br />Councilmember Stolzmann referred to the storage facility on Lock Street and asked if <br />industrial was the correct zoning for that location because of its proximity to the trail, park <br />and residences <br />Councilmember Leh asked if the costs of regulating had been considered His <br />understanding was the excise tax was being considered to help with staffing for <br />regulating Director Zuccaro noted it could help with staffing but was not limited to that. <br />