My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 12:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 23, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />these considered together and it could cause an issue of the estimate of tax receipts and <br />trying to estimate far into the future. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if a moratorium could be imposed to allow time for <br />considering rules. City Attorney Kelly said that would be an option but would cause the <br />same complications with the excise tax. <br />Councilmember Leh was concerned about the effective date. He noted Council had been <br />receiving resident comments about tightening the regulations. He wondered if the 5% of <br />average market rate was clear. <br />City Attorney Kelly asked if the language should be "the rate of five percent (5%) of the <br />average market rate, which is the average price of unprocessed retail marijuana that is <br />sold or transferred from a retail marijuana cultivation facility". Councilmember Leh said <br />that language was better. <br />Councilmember Keany asked about timing if setbacks were being looked at tonight. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton anticipated some conversation on setbacks. He asked staff about <br />setback requirements on retail. Director Zuccaro stated it is 1000 foot from public and <br />private schools. No buffer from parks or other facilities. Spacing was established at 1500 <br />feet between stores. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if there were setbacks from parks <br />originally. Director Zuccaro answered yes among other requirements. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment. <br />Dave Nosier, 604 Mead Court, felt the issue is not about setbacks, revenue, or <br />philosophical differences but a matter of quality of life. He spoke to Lafayette about plans <br />to expand square footage for cultivation. What he discovered was cultivation facilities <br />have spent a lot of money trying to mitigate odor and have not totally succeeded. <br />Lafayette's odor mitigation plans are strict but if you go to the condo association in <br />Lafayette the odor is there. He asked if any other cities have cultivation only a street <br />width from cultivation which could happen on Empire Road. <br />Tom DeLorey, 587 Augusta Lane noted he previous lived in Colorado Springs near a <br />home growing marijuana in the basement 500 feet away and the scent of the skunk smell <br />some marijuana produces was strong. He felt once this gets approved, the city never will <br />get rid of it. He doesn't want that in Louisville; it will affect the quality of life. If there is no <br />breeze, the scent will just sit there. He does not object to the sale or consumption but <br />does not want to allow the cultivation in Louisville. <br />Patricia Ross, 3561 W. Monmouth Ave., Englewood, grew up in Louisville and opposes <br />marijuana grows. She asked Council not to pass this as is and to consider setbacks or <br />buffers. She would like impact studies done on water and waste. The criminal element <br />should be considered. Louisville is off the beaten path and that could invite crime. She <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.