My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 12:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 23, 2019 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />Mike Deborski, 601 Pine Street noted most folks know someone in the marijuana <br />business. He was not disparaging of those in the industry. He noted he has driven by <br />several cultivation facilities and felt the regulations are behind actual issues. Someone <br />has to live with issues while until a complaint is entered. He urged Council to add a <br />special review and a setback to consider neighborhoods. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton said the idea we have not looked at the numbers is false. <br />Revenue would be available to support staff as well as drug education and other general <br />purposes. The amount of revenue will be dependent on the cultivation facilities opened. <br />We are not considering this to just break even. He suggested a conversation about <br />setbacks from residential areas perhaps at 1000 feet. He asked if that would still provide <br />industrial land for cultivation. <br />Director Zuccaro felt the Lock Street storage would be excluded and the old City shop <br />area would be excluded at 1000 feet. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton wanted to talk about using an SRU process providing public <br />opinion and criteria being met. Director Zuccaro noted there is an administrative SRU <br />allowance and it should be specified if there needs to be public hearings. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted he toured a cultivation facility in Boulder. Early on there <br />were some odor issues. Now it was well regulated, this facility didn't use pesticides, and <br />energy use is highly automated. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted a daycare could choose to come in after a marijuana <br />business was in place. The residential buffer of 1000 feet is a well -reasoned approach. <br />Councilmember Maloney wondered about a buffer at CTC; there are homes there. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted those are not zoned for residential. Councilmember <br />Maloney wondered if special review was valuable once a buffer was in place. Mayor Pro <br />Tem Lipton felt it would give all property owners an opportunity to weigh in. <br />Councilmember Keany addressed comments from residents and noted the limit on <br />cultivation would be 150,000 total square footage. Grow operations are not allowed <br />outside. The excise tax would cover expenses and there would be additional use tax. He <br />noted the old City shops are still owned by the City. He supported a 1000 foot setback <br />from residentially zoned areas and agreed an SRU is not necessary with a buffer but <br />would not disagree with requiring a special review. He was not going to support this. He <br />noted this would only leave the CTC area and they have already said it was a use they <br />would not allow. He saw no benefit to having cultivation in Louisville. <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.