My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 12:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 23, 2019 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Ordinance No. 1777, Series 2019 with an <br />amendment to Section 5.11.030 to add a 1250 foot buffer to residentially zoned districts. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton seconded and offered a friendly amendment to include an <br />additional item to Section 6 that says applicants will be subject to applicable SRU <br />requirements. Mayor Muckle accepted the friendly amendment. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the buffer should be in the ballot title. Attorney Kelly noted there <br />were no references in the ballot title as to the specifics so it did not need to be added <br />there. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann thought the buffer reference should be in the zoning section of <br />the code. She suggested Section 17.16.237. Staff agreed. Mayor Muckle accepted as a <br />friendly amendment. <br />Councilmember Loo felt with the setbacks and an SRU it becomes very complex. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann felt it was good to go to voters with this question. She read a <br />letter from a resident about regulating different types of businesses. Council continues to <br />face the question of what government can and should do. She noted she tries to be fair <br />and even handed and these are the challenges with having an industrial park. She <br />thought our regulations need to be in place in case CTC decides to change their rules. <br />VOTE: Roll call vote — 5-2 with Mayor Muckle and Councilmember Keany voting no. <br />Council took a short break. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1778, SERIES 2019 — AN ORDINANCE SUBMITTING TO THE <br />REGISTERED ELECTORS AT THE REGULAR ELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER <br />5, 2019 A BALLOT ISSUE TO ALLOW THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE TO KEEP <br />REVENUES THAT OTHERWISE WOULD BE REFUNDED, TO CONTINUE TO <br />COLLECT THE TAX AT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RATE, AND TO SPEND ALL <br />REVENUES COLLECTED FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE LOUISVILLE <br />RECREATION/SENIOR CENTER AND POOL FACILITIES AT MEMORY SQUARE <br />PARK — 2nd READING, PUBLIC HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 7/14/19) <br />City Attorney Kelly introduced the ordinance by title. Mayor Muckle opened the public <br />hearing. <br />City Attorney Kelly noted at the 2016 election voters approved a .15% sales and use tax <br />for maintaining the recreation center, senior center, and Memory Square pool. In <br />connection with any new tax or tax increase the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) <br />requires the City to provide an estimate in the ballot issue of the amount of revenue to be <br />raised in the first full year of the tax which was 2018. In the ballot issue notice mailed to <br />voters the City was required to provide an estimate of 2018 fiscal year spending without <br />the tax increase. The revenue raised by the new tax and the 2018 fiscal year spending <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.