My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
8/23/2019 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
620
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 30, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Councilmember Loo stated it behooves us to let other municipalities to go through the <br />hard work and wait for that information. If we have a moratorium we have to act on <br />changes and move the process forward as it would be temporary and we can't have serial <br />moratoria. It is more cost effective and responsible for us to allow other cities to test the <br />legal risk and wait to see what happens. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we are trying to gauge the risk of a moratorium. City <br />Attorney Kelly stated it would be defensible for more than one extension on a moratorium <br />if the City Council is actively working on rules, at least for a reasonable time. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated both tools could work but the moratorium may be safer. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated starting working on rules will require we take other <br />projects off the work plan. It might take more staff time and money than it is worth. <br />City Attorney Kelly stated if the Council wants a moratorium the City would have to show <br />they are making progress on rules with the clear goal of drafting regulations. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like a quick moratorium to be clear we are not open for <br />business. <br />Councilmember Keany stated a moratorium may encourage people to apply for a permit <br />to get it in as soon as possible. <br />Mayor Muckle noted the risk is very low now because of the geology. There are <br />advantages to not having a moratorium and upsetting the oil and gas industry for no <br />reason. He stated that because the risk is so low #3 makes sense. To invest the time and <br />effort on new rules and to create public uproar seems unnecessary right now. <br />City Attorney Kelly stated one consideration is that the approach in #3 has not been court - <br />tested. <br />Councilmember Keany supports #3 to allow the City the most options at the least cost. <br />City Manager Balser stated some municipalities are well along the way with regulations <br />and we can use that information as a basis for ours, but a significant effort and large <br />amount of staff time would be needed for this as well as a funding allocation. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated we will need to make an effort in the next year or so due to <br />the new state laws and changes in technology regardless of the cost. Our residents will <br />want us to do this. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she is comfortable with #3 and waiting for the work of other <br />municipalities that we can piggyback on. The risk is low for us due to the geology. A <br />moratorium is a financial and time commitment we may not be ready to make. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.