Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Variance <br />Property Address: <br />327 W. Sycamore Ln. <br />Louisville, CO 80027 <br />Description of Variance Request: <br />The variance requested is to build an addition above an existing non -conforming garage. The <br />proposed addition and existing garage's east side do not conform to the 5' sideyard setback. <br />There is also a jog in the east property line. Part of the variance request is also to stack the <br />addition's north wall on the garage's existing north wall. <br />Response to Each Criteria: <br />1. Unique physical circumstances peculiar to the affected property. This property is <br />different from most of the rest of the homes in the neighborhood in that the east side of <br />the main house and attached garage are very close to the east property line. Upon <br />studying the included ILC, you will see the east property line has a jog in it. The house <br />`spoons' the property line and the jog. The property is also abnormally narrow. These <br />characteristics contribute to the non -conforming nature of the garage. <br />2. The unusual circumstances do not exist throughout the neighborhood. In general, there <br />aren't many neighboring houses that hug the property line in the way 327 W. Sycamore <br />does. Many neighborhood houses are within 5' sideyard setback, but 327 W. Sycamore <br />is one of the few which has a wall so close to the property line. <br />3. Property cannot reasonably be developed in conformity with Louisville zoning code. The <br />obvious place to add square footage to this type of home in the most thrifty manner is <br />above the garage. An addition above the garage: <br />o Utilizes the existing garage foundation. <br />o Is by far the most economical and aesthetic solution. <br />o Does not add any building coverage to the small lot. <br />o Is very common in the neighborhood. Many property owners have done this. In <br />fact, there are recent precedents of additions just like this occurring on top of <br />non -conforming garages. For example, 463 W. Sycamore Ct. has a large addition <br />above the garage which is non -conforming; the edge of the garage is within the 5' <br />sideyard setback, and the back (NE) corner is close to/on the property line. <br />Furthermore, it's sensible to stack the addition on existing walls. From a structural <br />perspective it's simpler, and from an architectural standpoint, an addition above the <br />garage would look far more natural if it matches the width of the garage (and will better <br />fit in with the character of the neighborhood). <br />4. Hardship has not been created by the applicant. The property owners inherited this <br />hardship when they purchased the property in 2007. There haven't been any changes to <br />the existing building envelope since the home was originally built. <br />