My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2019 08 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2019 08 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:14 PM
Creation date
8/26/2019 9:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 19, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Staff finds that all six criteria in Municipal code Section 17.48.110 are met and <br />recommends the Board of Adjustment approval of the variance request. <br />Board Questions of Staff: <br />None heard. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Applicant: Andy Hashman, Mosaic Outdoor Living, 133 McCaslin Blvd <br />Hashman says the design is to exactly match the pitch of the existing roof lines. With <br />pictures, he shows the board the other neighbors with a 4:12 pitch and the applicant's <br />house with a 4:12 pitch. The architect that designed the house and helped develop the <br />PUD did not follow their own rules in regarding the roof. He informs the board that many <br />other neighbors are considering doing the same as the applicant. <br />Board Questions of Applicant: <br />Ewy asks if the 4:12 pitch is only for the dormers and entry ways. <br />Hashman says the entire lower level's roof pitches are all 4:12. <br />Stuart mentions that what is proposed looks nicer than a flat roof. <br />Public Comment in Favor: <br />None heard. <br />Public Comment Against: <br />None heard. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Board: <br />Stuart says he agrees with staff's finding of the six criteria. <br />Ewy agrees with staff's recommendation and says that a flat roof would look worse than <br />what is proposed. <br />Gorsevski agrees with staff's report and recommendation. <br />Leedy also agrees with staff's report and recommendation. <br />Motion is made by Stuart to approve a patio cover with a roof pitch less than 6:12. <br />Motion is seconded by Gorsevski. Roll call vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.