My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 09 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 09 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:29 AM
Creation date
9/10/2019 2:38:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />August 12, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Business Matters of Commission <br />• Discussion/Direction of Agreement Regarding Property Tax TIF Revenue <br />Sharing, Highway 42 Revitalization Area <br />City Manager Balser noted staff has been working on this draft agreement with the <br />Fire District. Talking with bond counsel, the bonds take priority so there are no funds <br />from the core area to share with the fire district. There are areas outside the core. <br />Staff is re -looking at this and will need to bring numbers back to the Commission. <br />Attorney Kelly noted with the removal of the core area, the numbers will look different. <br />The agreement will look essentially the same, the underlying numbers will be different. <br />City Manager Balser noted the IGA with the County was before the bond. Attorney <br />Kelly stated the TIF revenue within the core area is pledged toward payment of the <br />bond. Calculation of sharing options needs to be re -figured. <br />City Manager Balser noted staff will continue to work with the Fire District. Agreement <br />will look essentially the same just with the numbers redone. Staff will try to bring back <br />for the September 9 meeting. <br />Fire District originally planned to ask for 3.9 mills increase then decrease 3.8 or 3.75. <br />Since it is unlikely they will have an agreement in place, they will most likely proceed <br />with asking for the 3.9 mills then reduce based on the amount of revenue realized. <br />• Consideration of Approval of Resolution 10-01, Approving an Agreement <br />with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. for Consulting Services <br />Chairperson Fisher introduced the item and noted it is an agreement for third party <br />review of the financial information provided on the TIF rebate assistance application <br />made by Boulder Creek Builders for the Terraces on Main project. LRC criteria <br />requires third party review. Director Zuccaro noted it will likely take 4-6 weeks to do the <br />review. The company might propose alternatives. City Manager Balser said they do <br />sensitivity analysis. They will work with Boulder Creek. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked <br />if they have can provide different scenarios for amount of retail. <br />Director Zuccaro said they will give us some analysis on return on investment. Staff <br />can ask them if they are comfortable to give an opinion based on different scenarios. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted there should be some incentive to bring in retail. <br />Commissioner Bradfield thought space for storefronts reduces risk. He thinks there <br />should be some incentive to think about design. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.