Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2019 09 11

Home Browse Search

Open Space Advisory Board Minutes August 14, 2019 Page 2 of 4 yet closed on the property and their plan is not fully developed in some areas. Mayor Muckle encouraged OSAB members to attend. B. David asked about status of marijuana dispensaries: Has there been a determination as to recommended setbacks? Bob responded: Yes - it's 1,250 ft. from any residential -zoned property. 7. Board Updates A. David reported that the wooden bridge at the base of the Aquarius trailhead on the Coal Creek Trail is very slick in wet/damp conditions and hazardous for cyclists. He recommended lighting in the underpass, which is very dark, and re- surfacing the wood on the bridge. Laura agreed that this is a good idea. Ember agreed to assess & follow up with staff. B. Laura reported that she plans to attend the Brue Baukol presentation and encourages other OSAB members attend (as citizens, not as OSAB representatives). C. David requested a staff update on re -design of trail south of Community Park, as current mixed configuration is confusing and potentially hazardous for pedestrians as well as bicyclists. Ember reported that Council wants to maintain crusher fines and ADA access and staff will be monitoring usage and maintenance issues going forward. D. Laura reported that Coyote Run Open Space flood/slumping mitigation is in progress, and was disappointed that this work has started without communication from Planning Department to OSAB as to plans and outcomes. E. David reported that flashing pedestrian lights at 104th St. (East of the Tech Center) are not yet up and running. 8. Public Comments on Items Not on the Agenda NA - no members of the public were present. 9. Discussion Item: Tiger Team Recommendations for Opportunities for Preserving Open Space and Improving Trail Connectivity: Review Findings and Finalize Results (see pgs. 6-9 of the August 2019 OSAB Meeting packet) Peter explained that the Tiger Team worked mostly on the last two columns: "Acquisitions" and "Proposed OS Zoning". The black comments are from prior years; red comments were added by Peter, and green comments were added by Ember. Peter noted one ranking of 2.3 as probable error; Ember to review & revise. Fiona asked what "PUD" and "CE" mean. Peter explained that "PUD" = Plan Unit Development, which could incorporate Open Space designations in parts of these properties. Missy noted that past PUD processes have been rather unsatisfying in terms of Open Space. Peter noted that his past planning and land use experience leads him to believe that some Open Space goals can be met through this process. "CE" = Conservation Easement. Laura proposed rating as High, Medium, and Low. Helen noted that she doesn't want Council to think the "Low" properties are not worth considering. Bob noted that this ranking is not essential for Council. OSAB agreed to omit this ranking this year. 4