My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 09 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 09 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:59 PM
Creation date
9/19/2019 9:27:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 3, 2019 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />allowing them in the right of way is not a reasonable way to do this There is a solution by <br />allowing signs on private property <br />Councilmember Keany suggested limiting the number of signs per yard and not to make it <br />unlimited There should be a reasonable limit set. Some members did not agree <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports an allowance for temporary signs under very specific <br />rules Councilmember Stolzmann stated it should be clear where signs could be allowed <br />and maybe start very regulated and can open up if want to Also she would like to know if <br />the police department can enforce this Councilmember Keany suggested limiting the <br />number per business or intersection <br />Councilmember Loo stated she supports not allowing in the public right of way She <br />supports it as written Councilmember Maloney agreed <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like suggestions from staff on how we might be able to <br />address this for real estate agents <br />Councilmember Leh would like some options to consider Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed <br />He wondered if there was a way to have a pilot program <br />Members all supported the change to US 36 signs <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if Council would consider charging no fee for mural <br />permits Councilmember Maloney stated we should charge enough for reimbursing staff <br />time Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would prefer no charge as a way to <br />encourage art. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed with Councilmember Maloney, if it costs the City resources <br />to review these and there should be a fee It can be established through the fee schedule <br />each year <br />Councilmember Leh agreed with Councilmember Stolzmann that there should be no fee <br />when there is already a first amendment issue here He worries these regulations may be <br />overly burdensome and hard to enforce <br />Director Zuccaro stated one option is to make it a minimal fee that can be determined with <br />the fee schedule Members agreed to this <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked about commercial yard signs and if there are any rules <br />Director Zuccaro stated off premise signs are not allowed, he added home occupation <br />signs are not allowed Staff will do more research <br />Public Comments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.