Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2019 10 10

Home Browse Search

Building Code Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes 05/02/2019 Page 3 of 8 amount for one of the permits and 4x the amount for the other. Gstalder states that Louden attained permits once he discovered no permit was pulled. Louden is a longtime resident, raised his kids and has coached in Louisville. Gstalder states Louden has helped a lot of residents after the June 2018 hail storm with the insurance process and temporary fixes. Gstalder states these were honest disputes with the inspectors regarding ice and water shield. Louden has never abandoned a customer. The statements of liens were a "notice of intent" to lien, not a recorded lien. Gstalder hopes this is not an appropriated case for revocation/suspension of license. Presentation of Evidence by city: Roots states Hines is not available as a witness. Ben-y states and marks the evidence in the packet as exhibit A. Berry asks for objection: Gstalder has an objection due to the fact Ted Hine is not available andthe affidavit is a conclusion, not fact. Berry states it is prudent to accept the signed affidavit as,_evidence as it was approved. Exhibit A is admitted. Root states theaffdavit must meet arit_eria in order to present to the board. Roots presents the followrig-1. Alleged fact, a roofwas ll installed without a permit. 2. Alleged fact, na for required inspectionsn.13: Alleged fact, no mid roof inspection -per land management codec,4. Alleged fact, 611 w. Sagebrush too much roof covered for inspection land1 anagement code. 5. Alleged fact, 1160 Hillside Lane, no mid roof(nspeecction. 6. Alleged fact,1160 Hillside, no permit issued. 7. Alleged fact, 583 Mano od lane, inspector had corrections but were never corrected, no ice and watarishield 8. Alleged act, several expired permits, 1004 Tumberry, 592 McCaslih�,,269 S$McCaslin. 9. Alleged fact, failure to pay his sub contractors Cross Exam by Gstalder: Gstalder asks was permit eventually pulled on 318 South PI? Root states a permit hasipiiptAtgcl andis ready for final inspection. Root states the mid roof was not do:Oe: Shingles were pulled back for a spot check and the mid roof inspection passed. Gstalder asks 516 Grant, a permit was pulled Root states there was a permit sued s'talder asks if there was a mid-off. Root states too much was4covered so no in eectio ok place. Gstalder restates too much of the roof was covered in order to perforen a mrno d roof inspection but the inspection were called in. Gstalder states, 1160 Hillside did not get a permit, then asks Root —did they get a permit. Rotates after paying penalties Louden did get a permit for 1160 Hillside. Gstalder asks what thetatus is of that permit Root states he believes it has passed the final inspection�Gsalder asks if the city was aware Louden was disputing the necessity of installinggice and water shield over a porch. Root stated he did not know that. Gstalder asks were Tumberry, and the two McCaslin addresses granted extension. Root states he would have to look into the permitting software to be sure. Gstalder states in the packet and the city's paperwork it shows extensions were granted. Gstalder asks if Root knows of any liens being recorded in Boulder County Land Records. Root states that he is aware that residents calling him are asking why they were getting liens on their property. Gstalder repeats the same question. Roots states he is not aware of recorded liens.