Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 16, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Klemme moved and Parris seconded a motion to find probable cause. Motion passed <br />unanimously by roll call vote. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br />Pre -Filing Conference for 816 Lincoln <br />Andy Johnson, 922A Main Street with DAJ Design, presented the Historic Structure <br />Assessment for 816 Lincoln. He noted that the 1875 date on a deed he found could <br />bring into question some of the dates for homes in Louisville that were based on <br />accessor's cards. He presented photos from the assessment and the layout of the <br />structure. He showed that the old subfloor was significantly different from the current <br />one and that the mudroom and the bathroom were additions. He surmised that the <br />mudroom could have been a porch enclosure, but it seemed more likely that it was an <br />entirely new addition, like the bathroom. He explained that none of the current windows <br />were original and were much smaller than the original ones. The historic front porch <br />columns were larger and probably wood, whereas now the columns are metal. <br />Johnson then showed the basement and crawlspace. The columns and the support <br />system were in generally good condition, though they were not to today's building <br />standards. The basement also showed the division between the old and new parts of <br />the overall structure and the original brick columns under the house. Johnson's team <br />conducted a test hole to investigate the outside of the foundation and it appears that <br />someone had poured a rough footing and then put a brick foundation on top. There was <br />also a brick skirt around the outside of the house. On the inside, the brick had a stucco <br />layer over it. There was also a dugout portion of the basement with buttress walls, <br />supporting the load of the soil that was pressing out from the foundation. <br />Johnson then described the attic, roof, and exterior details. He believed that previous <br />occupants planned to build out the attic for occupation but never completed the project. <br />The windows and doors were not original. The front porch was likely original except for <br />the columns. There was some wood detailing along the wall that may have been part of <br />the original columns. You can still see the footprint of the old columns. <br />Johnson also described the priority list of landmark improvements in the assessment <br />and gave the updated HSA cost breakdown. He also described the initial plans for new <br />building on the lot. <br />Haley noted that the rotating, 3D elevation of the plans in Mr. Johnson's presentation <br />was a helpful visualization. <br />Dickinson thanked Mr. Johnson for his presentation and for taking the time to educate <br />the Commission on the assessment process. He observed that some preservation - <br />minded people would love the draft addition and some would hate it. From the outside, <br />the house looks like an old home, and some people would appreciate that. Others may <br />feel offended by the size of the home, which was once a small home and loses its <br />