My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 10 30
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 10 30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
11/14/2019 12:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, September 13, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />consideration and will send out for committee to review. Committee talked about <br />meeting in October and determined they will schedule for a future date. <br />IX. Utility 2020 Rates <br />Mr. Peterson referred to the chart on Page 15 of the packet and started with the <br />budget table. Explained the 3 different options. Option A — Proposed 2020 <br />Budget, Option B — New projects scheduled for Council and Option C — Long- <br />term projects that we've been talking through that we are holding as place <br />holders and will dig into these later. Councilmember Stolzmann said that Mr. <br />Watson and Mrs. Balser put together a nice budget presentation for us and the <br />Committee put together some graphs that show all the different funds and so the <br />group looks to the Utility Committee to say, "What are these projects and is this a <br />good idea" so we need to be able to say "these are good". Mr. Peterson stated <br />the majority of requested increases were to bring the budget in line with prior <br />expenditures. So the amendment for the 2020 was re-establishing back to the <br />2019 level and sometime the 2018 level. Mr. Peterson continued with explaining <br />Option "A" saying they added 2018 actuals for reference. Mr. Kowar continued <br />with describing the professional services line item explaining that consulting <br />services were needed as to address staffing shortages. Councilmember <br />Stolzmann went on to say in the Water Utility budgeting side, this looks like a lot <br />of carry forwards with a large fund balance. Mr. Watson added it was about 15% <br />operational. Mr. Kowar explained we are working on a $50,000 budget level not <br />$10,000 line item level and because we are lean we need some breathing room <br />which some are based on trends and contracts we have. Mr. Watson agreed. <br />Committee continued discussing Option "B". Councilmember Maloney stated he <br />sees this as a long-term investment so it makes sense. Councilmember <br />Stolzmann asked if everyone is in agreement with Option "B"s set of new projects <br />with 2019 Budget and 2020 Amendments. Committee all agreed and is <br />recommending Option "B". Mr. Peterson went on explaining Option "C" with the <br />two large projects that will be over budget and will be carried over in the rates but <br />we listed so you can see them. Mr. Kowar said we are taking the Administration <br />Building out for now. Mr. Peterson stated this is all just for information right now <br />and provide an outlined of the transmission line capacity project. Mrs. Balser <br />asked that right now we are keeping what we anticipated in 2020 and not making <br />any changes. Mr. Peterson said yes then continued with the plan of completing <br />the design allowing for a better cost estimate before a decision is made to move <br />forward with construction. Councilmember Stolzmann then asked if there are any <br />other questions on the different budget adjustments and there were none. She <br />continued and said thank you for taking us through this as it was really useful. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann went on to talk about the Fund Reserves and <br />Combined Reserves chart on page 16. Mr. Peterson explained the different color <br />bars and what they represented. Mr. Peterson went on to explain the other <br />options as aligning with those in the previous discussion. Councilmember <br />Maloney said for a future agenda item we should talk about minimum fund <br />balance. The Committee agreed and requested that this be added as a <br />discussion point in a future agenda. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.