My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 11 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 11 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
11/18/2019 11:47:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
971
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 15, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the draft RFP and recommended <br />approval. Staff recommends approval. <br />Councilmember Loo asked about the City providing liability insurance for volunteers. <br />Director Zuccaro thought the volunteers would be covered. City Attorney Kelly noted that <br />was fairly common but could follow up with our broker. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if a private contractor would have problems with covering <br />volunteers. Director Zuccaro noted the City wouldn't provide insurance for the <br />professionals but perhaps could for the volunteer labor and didn't anticipate it as a <br />problem. <br />Planner Selvoski noted there are contractors who do use volunteers. Councilmember <br />Loo was concerned the volunteer clause might cause the price to actually be higher. <br />She wanted the cost of volunteers broken out as a separate cost line item. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann said there was a cost basis from the bids from last time <br />without volunteers. She supported the RFP as is. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked about the cabins being assigned to the Museum. He <br />wondered if they would actively be used and if that could trigger ADA issues. <br />Director Zuccaro noted the Miner's Field was chosen as a good location for public access. <br />The Museum is excited to have them and will look at how they might use them for <br />programming. City Manager Balser noted there would be conversation about how to use <br />them in the future. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if future use would affect any permitting in moving and <br />reconstructing them. Director Zuccaro noted that would have to be developed and if there <br />would be any barriers to having them available for public use. Building code compliant <br />plans could be requested. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked about the volunteer phrase in the RFP. He liked the idea <br />but was hesitant now seeing it in writing and wondered about the number of contractors <br />willing to bid on this. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann felt the discussion on these cabins has been mixed. This <br />could be a great project with some volunteers. There had been a contract before that <br />was terminated. She wanted to give clear direction. <br />Councilmember Loo noted the contract presented before was now nearly a year old and <br />construction costs have gone up. She wanted a separate line item to see volunteer cost. <br />She thought there would be more bids if there was not a requirement to use volunteers. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.