My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 11 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 11 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:12 AM
Creation date
11/18/2019 12:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 10th, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />from half of the sign to 1/6th. He characterized what happened as a taking of Speedy <br />Sparkle's right to an adequate sign. <br />Kearney described two ways to solve the problem. First, all three property owners could <br />agree to change the current sign and do PUD amendments for all the properties. That <br />would mean a bigger joint sign. Alternatively, the applicant could amend the car wash <br />PUD only and build their own monument sign on their property, as proposed in July. <br />The applicant wanted to correct the PUD amendment, obtain equitable signage, and <br />obtain adequate signage. He noted that the proposed sign on South Boulder Road and <br />the sign on Hecla Way were smaller than allowed. <br />Kearney showed a board that compared the proposed car wash signs plus the menu <br />signs with the existing King Soopers signs, pointing out the difference in signage among <br />the property owners. He showed the customer feedback forms from the car wash <br />customers voicing support of their proposed signs. Customers felt it was difficult to find <br />the car wash, even with GPS. He explained that the new application proposed a smaller <br />sign on Hecla Way than they had proposed in July and that they had taken out the <br />electronic message sign as requested by the Commission. He responded to <br />Commissioner William's question, explaining that they could not mount the sign at the <br />eastern section of the property. <br />Hoefner and Kearney discussed the effect of the Black Diamond history on the current <br />Speedy Sparkle application. Hoefner wanted to know if the applicant had thought he <br />would be entitled to more signage when he bought the property and Kearney explained <br />that he had not thought about the signage when he bought the place, but that it was <br />important that the King Soopers PUD was not in the public record for the Black <br />Diamond Car Wash. <br />Hoefner then asked about the translucence of the sign. <br />Kearney replied that the Speedy Sparkle logo had a bright green background that would <br />be translucent and the two additional panels would have translucent lettering with <br />darker backgrounds. <br />Brauneis asked to enter the sign board into the record. Moline moved and Hoefner <br />seconded. Motion approved unanimously by voice vote. <br />Chip Weincek, of CW Architecture at 672 West Pine Street in Louisville, showed the <br />logo of the Speedy Sparkle Car Wash. He explained that logos and signage were a big <br />deal for small businesses. <br />Kearney introduced his employees and his wife in the audience. <br />Weincek described the process so far starting in September 2018, summarizing the <br />comments from the July Planning Commission meeting. He explained that staff had not <br />focused on those comments, instead focusing on other concerns. He also felt the <br />meetings with staff had been too short. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.