My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 12 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 12 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2021 10:37:32 AM
Creation date
12/18/2019 8:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A3
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
426
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Louisville Citizen Survey <br />June 2016 <br />Planning and Building Safety Department <br />Between 60% and 71% of those with an opinion rated the aspects of the Louisville Planning and Building <br />Safety Department as excellent or good. Public input on planning issues was rated most positively, while the <br />building permit process received less favorable ratings (see the figure on the following page). <br />It should be noted that at least 40% of respondents selected "don't know" when assessing the quality of each <br />of the planning and building safety services (see Appendix A: Complete Set of Frequencies for a full set of <br />responses, including "don't know"). <br />Ratings for the Planning and Building Safety Department tended to decrease since the last survey iteration, <br />including building/construction inspection process (77% excellent or good in 2012 vs %65 in 2016), planning <br />review process for new development (from 71% to 63%) and overall performance of the department (76% to <br />63%). Some of the difference in opinions could be at least partially attributable to changes in question <br />wording. <br />The only item that could be compared to the benchmark database was the overall performance of the <br />Louisville Planning Department. This rating was much higher the national benchmark (see Appendix D: <br />Benchmark Comparisons). A Front Range comparison was not available. <br />Males, those living in attached units and households without children tended to give lower quality ratings to <br />the public input process on City planning issues than did females, those living in detached units and <br />households with children (see Appendix B: Comparison of Responses by Respondent Demographics). No <br />differences were observed by ward. <br />Report of Results <br />Prepared by National Research Center, Inc. <br />16 <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.