My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 12 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 12 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
12/31/2019 11:32:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18th, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />community in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Selvoski explained that the physical <br />integrity remained intact. <br />Staff recommends approval to find probable cause and the approval of $4,0000 toward <br />the cost of a Historic Structure Assessment. <br />Klemme asked why the front porch roof did not look the same today or if it was just the <br />angle of the photo in the packet. <br />Selvoski replied that there were no changes to the roof noted in the building file. The <br />house had received funding for urban renewal in 1978, so if there were any changes it <br />would likely have been then, but there was no record of any such changes to the roof. <br />Parris noted that the other changes made it look like the roof had changed, as well. <br />Dickinson noted that probable cause was a low bar and that preservation did not need <br />to save every building, but this house was an adorable and typical home on La Farge. <br />He was happy that the applicant was here and noted that the Commission wanted the <br />applicant to investigate. <br />Joanna Alidu, 917 La Farge Avenue, the applicant, noted that she had started the <br />process of replacing the siding and reached out to Andy Johnson, who suggested she <br />wait to remove the siding and talk to the Commission first. <br />Dickinson moved to find probable cause. Klemme seconded. Motion passed by roll call <br />vote. <br />ITEMS FROM STAFF <br />Alteration/Demolition Updates <br />Selvoski stated that there had been no alteration certificates. There were two full <br />demolitions that had been referred to the full commission and would come in December. <br />Selvoski added a standing agenda item to request issues that the commissioners <br />wanted to work through. She noted that the Saving Places Conference was coming up <br />in late January and commissioners could attend. <br />Commissioner Ulm was the only commissioner who had not attended the conference <br />and Commissioner Klemme suggested he go. Dunlap and Dickinson shared their <br />experiences at the conference, which they thought was worthwhile. <br />Selvoski asked if any commissioners wanted to take on Commissioner Dickinson's role <br />writing for the monthly Downtown Dialogue blurb. <br />Dickinson noted that anything landmarked in the past three years was not on the pre - <br />written list. He explained that the duties were to queue it up and send it off. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.