Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 01 09

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 12th, 2019 Page 2 of 13 Brennan described that industrial zoning had been extended to the property in a General Development Plan Amendment in 2019. The proposal to replat would preserve the conservation easement and outlot on the north resulting in a 110' buffer and meets the requirements of Titles 16 and 17. The Final PUD proposal is for an 84,000 sq. ft. building, provides three points of vehicular access, two pedestrian access points, with parking and paving around the building and landscaping around that and throughout the site plan. The plan also included site drainage and break area, loading docks on the south side of the building that could covert to parking as part of a deferred parking proposal, and a trail connection through the city -owned out lot. The applicant is asking for a setback waiver for carports on the west side of lot, which would result in an 11'6" setback on a portion where 25' was required, a request which staff supports. Brennan also explained the architectural design and materials and showed renderings. Moline asked about the carport waiver and if the western property owner had commented on the waiver request. Brennan responded that he did not think they had made any comment, and there is landscaping and a retaining wall on the west side. Brauneis asked if they would be allowed to have the parking spaces in that location without the carport. Brennan replied that the surface parking would be allowed and met the CCDSG. Rice asked if the parking depended on the building's use. Brennan replied that it would be required to have two spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. to start and explained that the warehouse and office requirements differed, and that staff would evaluate at the time of a building permit for tenant finish if the parking was adequate or if the deferred parking would be necessary. Rice asked if the tenant finish permits would be the enforcement mechanism. Brennan confirmed. Rice asked suggested that there be a note on the PUD that the parking had to be in line with the use. General agreement from staff that that was possible. Brauneis asked if the entrance on CTC Boulevard was a full in and out. Brennan confirmed. Brauneis asked about the connectivity of the trail and noted that there was a social trail that connected the CTC to the Aquarius trail. He wondered if there was an opportunity to allow the connectivity from the interior of the CTC to connect with the trail itself. 4