My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 02 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 02 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 11:38:53 AM
Creation date
2/18/2020 8:31:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/12/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />January 13, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />Commissioner Bradfield asked about the mill levy comparison in the packet and <br />asked where the LFPD would be without the mill increase. Chief Willson said <br />they thought they would get what they needed going to voters. City Manager <br />Balser said that the LRC did agree to fund the agreement prior to the November <br />ballot. She said most urban renewal authorities have relationships with their <br />special districts. Under new legislation, the LRC would be required to share <br />revenues with other taxing agencies for new mill levy increases. Commissioner <br />Bradfield said he sees a commission that spends money on small potatoes, <br />rather than larger vision. He said he sees a pressing need of fire department. <br />Projecting the total value of the revenue sharing, Commissioner Bradfield asked <br />Chief Willson what the LFPD will do with $1 million over 10 years. Chief Willson <br />said it will help the LFPD keep people by paying them competitively, replace <br />equipment, keep the station operating efficiently, add staff, and add equipment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Tofte said it is not fair to not have the LFPD share in TIF. Chair <br />Fisher likes the proposed agreement and thinks it is a good use of money. <br />Commissioner Gambale can appreciate how expensive equipment is and <br />training. He has experience with EMS and is appreciative of the request. <br />Commissioner Bradfield is generally supportive and wants to have a plan for <br />money. <br /> <br />The agreement states that the first payment will be made early next year, so the <br />LRC can further discuss the District’s detailed plans for funding. <br /> <br />City Council member Lipton made a motion to approve the agreement and <br />forward it to City Council based on additional clarity of how money will be spent <br />specific to the Urban Renewal area and improving the safety of district. <br /> <br />Chair Fisher seconded the motion. <br />All in favor. <br /> <br />• Discussion of LRC 2020 Work Plan Draft <br />Economic Vitality Director Megan Pierce did brainstorming of ideas with the <br />LRC. She took the feedback and compiled into format to facilitate discussion. <br /> <br />Re: Village Square. Commissioner Gorsevski would prefer to not give money to <br />an owner who does not invest in the property. Council member Lipton said we <br />need to connect with ownership and there are multiple owners. This would be a <br />good use of staff time. Pierce said she can reach out to property owners. <br />Commissioner Bradfield said a sidewalk extension in that area would be helpful. <br />That sidewalk stretch is bad. Would be better for Village Square if pedestrian <br />access were improved. Council member Lipton said street lighting should be <br />looked at. Night lighting in the area is poor. <br /> <br />Packet P. 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.