My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2020 02 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2020 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2020 02 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:16 PM
Creation date
2/24/2020 10:13:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/4/2020
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 4, 2020 <br />Page 7of9 <br />Councilmember Lipton suggested removing the reimbursement option and requiring the <br />developer to pay all costs up front. <br />Councilmember Leh would like the water attorney to look at it again and staff take more <br />time to work on the language. He would like more clarity on how the City Manager may or <br />may not apply criteria. He feels the requirements are not clear and it will be hard to <br />administer and understand. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Attorney Kelly clarified the ordinance includes criteria on how water rights are <br />administered, it does not include criteria on if the water rights are determined to be <br />beneficial to the City. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated the goal is to allow people to bring water rights in certain <br />circumstances and that the City Manager has some discretion on what is accepted. If this <br />ordinance does not meet that need we can change it before approval. <br />Councilmember Lipton stated perhaps the intent can be clarified and perhaps it only <br />needs minor changes. He suggested changes in Section 1 and in Section 2 and removing <br />Section 3. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated he is fine with the ordinance as presented as it gives the <br />City the discretion it needs; the intent is clear. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated she supports a two -week delay to allow more work. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney stated this is a good framework. The goal is that the City <br />Manager needs to make a good business deal and he is fine with allowing the City <br />Manager to negotiate that. He stated he would be reticent to put in criteria that limits the <br />ability of the City Manager to negotiate a deal. He likes the amendment to make the <br />developer cover any and all costs. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Leh agreed the framework is good; however he would like the language <br />cleaned up. <br />Councilmember Leh moved to continue the ordinance to February 18 to allow time to <br />amend the language; seconded by Councilmember Lipton. <br />All in favor. <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.