My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 02 05
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2020 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 02 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 11:32:45 AM
Creation date
2/27/2020 4:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/5/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 22, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />sees that the Committee should be bringing forward policies and actions that <br />respond to areas of community concern. <br />All Committee members agreed that this meeting was a forum to have more in- <br />depth conversations and dialogue. <br />Andy Clark, Owner of Moxie Bread, stated that it is not just what the City is <br />doing now but the direction it is going. He said Lafayette has been thoughtful <br />toward its retail and events. <br />The Committee agreed Director Pierce would try to incorporate the discussion <br />and feedback into a distinct Purpose and Objectives for their consideration. <br />VIII. Discussion on Draft Cost of Development Scorecard: Director Pierce <br />explained that the Scorecard grew out of City Council’s review of water tap fees <br />in November 2019. There was a desire to understand the total impact of the <br />City’s fees on a development, as well as how this compared to surrounding <br />communities. <br />Mayor Stolzmann said the Scorecard should include information on the <br />difference in property taxes and property tax burden. She also suggested it <br />include a comparison of sales taxes in other communities. <br />Council Member Dickinson said that there was understanding as to why the <br />water tap fees increased significantly, but that the City needs to be able to <br />explain the ways in which we are competitive. <br />Jim Tienken, resident, stated that this does not capture the time value of <br />money. He understood it is difficult to empirically measure, but that the <br />reception from the City and the process are a big deal to developers. <br />Susan Loo, resident, suggested the Scorecard needs to capture the subsidies <br />that may be given by other entities. She said Louisville has not had a handle on <br />the packages other communities offer. <br />Mr. Clark said that he was not presented the option for business assistance <br />until after his lease was signed, so he was no longer eligible to apply. He <br />believes a business owner should not have to fish for that information. Mayor <br />Stolzmann agreed that there needs to be a conversation about the purpose and <br />for the program to be clear. <br />City Manager Balser clarified that it will be difficult for the Scorecard to be a true <br />apples-to-apples comparison. She also expressed it is important to focus on <br />what the City controls. <br />Staff will continue to gather data and refine the Scorecard information received. <br />Packet P. 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.