Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 01 10

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 8, 2007 Page 2 of 10 McAvinew moved and Loo seconded a motion to continue the Clementine Subdivision Filing No. 3 and PUD to the December 13, 2007 meeting as requested by the Applicant. Motion passed by voice vote. NOTE: 6:07 PM — Sheets and Deborski arrived. Regular Business — Public Hearing Items ➢ Resolution No. 24, Series 2007, Davidson Highline Minor Subdivision Replat, 2103 N. HWY 42, a minor subdivision replat to create three (3) lots from the currently plated two (2) lots. The request does not include a zoning change or a change in use to the existing property. Case #07-024-FP. • Applicant, Owner and Representative: Robert W. and Carol D. Lathrop • Case Manager: Paul Wood, Planning Director Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: None heard. Public Notice Verification: Published in the Daily Camera on October 21, 2007. Posted in City Hall, Publi Recreation Center and the Police and Courts Building and mailed to surrounding owners on October 19, 2007. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: McCartney provided the following summary: • Applicants are Robert and Carol Lathrop. • Property is located on the west side of Highway 42, between South Boulder Road and Baseline Road. • Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Davidson Highline Subdivision. • 5.44 acres in size. • Requesting a replat of the existing two -lot Davidson Highline Subdivision, proposing to subdivide the property into three -lots (Lots 1A, 2A and 3A). • Zoning will remain Planned Commercial / Residential (P-C/R). • The main purpose of the request >< create a third lot on the east side of the property to permit the extensio of a proposed collector road coming south from Takoda Village. In reviewing t e Takod ' age Development Plan, the developer is planning for the proposed road to extend so th, through the subject property, to eventually connect to Highway 42, in line with the existing Hecla Drive located to the east of Highway 42. McCartney stated the staff report reflects one condition of approval but since the writing of the staff report the Public Works Department has stated the condition is not necessary. Therefore Staff recommends approval without conditions. Commission Questions of Staff: None heard. ry, itY Applicant Presentation and Questions of the Applicant: Carol Lathrop stated she had no formal presentation. She thanked staff for the completeness of the report. She then asked the Commissioners if they had any questions. Deborski inquired if there were any plans for future uses for the subdivision. Lathrop stated there are not.