Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 01 10

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 8, 2007 Page 4 of 10 • Proposal is a final planned unit development (PUD) plan for the development of one (1) two story 84,430 SF flex / office building. • Property owners are R.E. Hill Properties — CTC Land, LLC • The project will require the consolidation of Lots 6 and 7 and a Covenant Agreement will be required to consolidate the properties. • The building design is subject to the Industrial Development and Design Standards and Guidelines (IDDSG). • The Site Plan, including building setbacks and the design of the parking and vehicular circulation are in compliance with the IDDSG. The development is designed to allow for two access points, where three access points would be permitted. Both access points come off of CTC Boulevard. • Parking is proposed at a ratio of 2 spaces per 1,000 SF. The site has been designed to yield a parking ratio of 3.6 spaces per 1,000 SF should the tenant wish to have primarily office uses. • Parking has also been provided for 18 bicycles. • Landscaping meets the required 25% of the lot area. • The project is responsible for the placement of landscaping in the conservation easement along Dillon Road and the right-of-way landscaping along CTC Boulevard. McCartney stated staff recommends ap Iroval of a final PUD for Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, CTC Filing No. 2 with the following two c c I itions: 1) This project is also responsible for the placement of landscaping in the conservation easement along Dillon Road and the right-of-way landscaping along CTC Boulevard. The landscaping will have to be installed at time of building devepment. 2) A Covenant Agreeme be required to consolidate the two properties. Commission Questions of Staff: None heard. Applicant Presentation and Questions of the Applicant: Bob Van Pelt stated his agreement with the staff report and the conditions as presented by staff. He also d a color display board of the project. Hart amo iefly discus f glazing. with Van Pelt the amount of glazing and indicated her approval of the Deborski inquired about the traffic at the two intersections — CTC Boulevard and Dillon Road and 104th and Dillon Road. He also asked if either would have a signal. McCartney stated he did not know the status of traffic signals but would be willing to contact the Public Works Department if so directed by the Commission. Deborski clarified with Van Pelt the building orientation as being at CTC Boulevard and not on Dillon Road. Lipton inquired if the building was a spec building or did they already have a tenant. Van Pelt replied the building is a spec. Members of the Public: None heard. Additional Questions of Applicant: