Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 04 17

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 20, 2008 Page 2 of 8 1/4, Sec. 5, T 1 S, R69W; south of Paschal Dr., west of HWY 42 (+ 700 ft. of highway frontage) and east of Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail line. Case No. 08-005-FS/ FP. • Applicant and Representative: RMCS, LLC (David Waldner) • Owner: Lockett Wood, Bob Lorenz, W.D. Hamm, • Case Manager: Paul Wood, Planning Director Public Notice: Published in the Daily Camera on March 2, 2008. Posted in City Hall, Public Library, Recreation Center and the Police and Courts Building and mailed to surrounding property owners on February 29, 2008. The property was also posted prior to February 29, ! 08. Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: Loo and Lipton stated their relationship with one of the owners of the property through the use of professional services that is offered by that individual (dentist). Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Wood requested a motion to enter into record all the meeting packet material for the March 20, 2008 Planning Commission meeting, the power point presentation that will be used during the staff and applicant presentation, and the draft Resolution No. 5. Pritchard moved and Russell seconded a motion to enter all items into public record. Motion passed by voice vote. Wood provided a brief summary of the o'ect by presenting the following new points of information: • Land Use: > Planning Area # 1: An amendment to the Compre ensive Plan would not be required. > Planning Area # 2: A total of 49 residential tenets (reduced from the previous request of 57 units), resulting in a density of 7.14 dwelling units per acre. 3ased on the given land area the maximum number of units under the Low Density designation would be 34 units, thus the applicant is requesting an increase of 15 units. Staff supports the increase in density as the higher density provides a more compact development footprint allowing for a park dedication as well as providing a good transition in residential density for Planning Area # 1 The increase in density does not exceed the limitation set by the Comp Pla scal Health: Staff finds t project is consistent with the Comp Plan in that the evelopment enables the City to maintain or enhance its fiscal position. • General Development Plan: Wood stated the Takoda GDP is consistent with the submittal requirements as set forth in Section 17.72.030 of the LMC. The GDP reflects a total residential allocation of 350 units. • Public -Use Dedication: based on the total land area a dedication of 8.89 acres is required. The proposed dedication of non -encumbered land is 9.05 acres. The encumbered land is an additional 4.78 acres. If authorized, a total dedication of 13.83 acres would result in a 22.7% dedication. • Vehicle Access and Traffic Impacts: As a condition of preliminary approval the applicant was required to acquire approval of an Access Permit from the Colorado Department of Transportation for the intersection of Paschal and HWY 42. At this time, Staff has not received an update from the applicant as to the status of the required access permit.