My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 05 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2008 Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 05 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:32:24 AM
Creation date
3/25/2020 2:49:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Development in Louisville is done on a case by case basis and all properties to the west of <br />245 Spruce Street are out of the "Old Town Overlay District" and subject to different <br />zoning. As such, future development would have to go through appropriate channels at <br />that time. The Planning Commission would not be meeting on the 245 Spruce Street <br />proposal a second time if minor subdivisions were automatically approved based on <br />precedent. Again, similar minor sub -divisions were approved at 1100 Grant Ave., 540 <br />W. Jefferson, and 945 Lincoln Avenue. <br />Finally, 245 Spruce Street is in a transition area and has been referred to as a "strange <br />area" or a "weird area" in reference to being located next to smaller properties further to <br />the east, and large properties outside of the "Old Town Overlay" to the west. The west <br />property line of the unimproved alley immediately to the west of 245 Spruce Street is the <br />edge of the "Old Town Overlay". As such it should be held to standards of the "Old <br />Town Overlay District", not to standards of larger properties to the west. Just the same, <br />larger properties to the west are not held to the standards of the "Old Town Overlay <br />Districts" more restrictive limitation of 27 foot height maximum on primary structures, <br />20 foot height limitation on secondary structures along with lot coverage and floor area <br />coverage limitations. The majority of homes in Old Town are on similar size lots as what <br />is being proposed for 245 Spruce street. In Louisville Heights (neighborhood for 245 <br />Spruce Street), 28% of the homes are on similar size lots, 41% or less are on lots with the <br />same or less street frontage of what is proposed for 245 Spruce Street. A majority of the <br />homes in "Old Town" are on comparable size lots as what is proposed for 245 Spruce <br />street. <br />In closing, I think the question to be asked is — What is best for the City of Louisville, two <br />smaller homes or one large house? <br />• Two moderately sized homes, each being more affordable to own, maintain, <br />heat and cool fitting with the character of "Old Town" — or — one large home <br />which is much more expensive to own, maintain, heat and cool. <br />• Which contributes to less sprawl and better land use, shelter for two families or <br />one? <br />• Which will contribute more to the local economy? Two families or one? <br />• Which meets City of Louisville goals of denser, more affordable housing? <br />Two homes or one? <br />In summation, if given the opportunity, I will build two highly appointed, modest in size <br />homes in character with Old Town Louisville. <br />Tha ou for your time and consideration of this matter! <br />Thomas amsey <br />WestMark Design & Construction, LLC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.