Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 12, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />O 1 bedroom - $746 - $1063 <br />O 2 bedroom — $895 — $1275 <br />O 3 bedroom — $1034 - $1475 <br />• Community outreach - four well -attended community meetings including two on April 29. <br />The next meeting is June 2 at Louisville Senior Center. <br />• Questions we asked are: <br />o What amenities would make you want? <br />o What features would make you weary? <br />• What We Heard: <br />o Provide opportunities for seniors outside of an elevator -served building. Seniors <br />want to live in multi -family housing just as easily as in a senior building. Many <br />amenities are being built to cater to the seniors and disabled. <br />o Provide unique open spaces. <br />o Make sure units are accessible for families with disabled children in wheelchairs <br />to seniors experiencing non -ambulatory periods. <br />• How We've Responded: <br />o All ground floor units fully accessible. Nearly'/4 of all units are fully accessible <br />and visitable. <br />o Increased the number of 1-bedroom units across the site. <br />o Integrated 7 unique pocket parks with varying themes. <br />• Our Interest List currently has 135 households on wait list. <br />• How to stay involved. <br />o Community meetings, Facebook, Website, public hearings. <br />Josh Erramousspe, Olsson Associates, 5285 McWhinney Blvd, Loveland, CO. Civil engineer. <br />The process is too early to discuss the street sections. The first submittal to the City had varying <br />width section of roadway as it navigated through the site. We were trying to accomplish traffic <br />calming to prevent higher speeds. We felt there was too much discussion that needed to <br />happen with the street sections prior to coming to today's meeting. We are showing the City's <br />standard street sections for both Kaylix and Hecla through the site tonight, and during final PUD <br />process, we will work with Staff to fine-tune them. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Brauneis asks about the community orchard. <br />Boyd says it is currently a detention pond with apples trees there. It was the inspiration for the <br />orchard through the design process. It will be graded with some removal of trees, but because <br />it is a detention area already, it will have an orchard feature. The trail will be located on the north <br />edge of the orchard and we hope people will pull off the trail and relax. <br />Brauneis asks about open space and its use as a detention basin. Do we always allow <br />dedicated open space to be used as a detention basin? This will be something new? <br />Russ says no; our land dedication is unencumbered and drainage is an encumbrance. We have <br />precedence in the City of encumbered land being used as part of the dedication. In those <br />settlements, often maintenance obligations were traded to the landowner. It is a case by case <br />issue. The trail is a no-brainer; the neighborhood park is exciting; the orchard is one of biggest <br />concerns the Parks Department rightfully had regarding concerns Commissioner Moline noted. <br />Staff recognizes our partner and wants to work with them. If we can balance out the <br />maintenance and costs, we think there is a solution but we are not prepared to show you yet. <br />Brauneis asks about water counts run on the detention basin and average residency time. How <br />often will there be water in there, and will there be water throughout the year? <br />Erramousspe says to expand on Russ's conversation about the Goodhue Ditch people, we have <br />met with the Board and are still negotiating release rates with them. What our current plan tells <br />